🚀 go-pugleaf

"Fella" <nosp@m.here> wrote in message
news:928Be.4376$x12.2509@reader1.news.jippii.net
> Arny Krueger wrote:

>> Obviously, everything doesn't sound the same all the
time,

> Take the issue up with pinkerton there.

Not his problem, not my problem.

>> Guess what Fella, audio equipment has other attributes
than
>> sound quality.

> Guess what krueger, sound quality is the foremost
attribute to
> be taken into consideration.

Fella, like your leader Middius, you have a wonderful
command of the obvious.

>Then comes durability and
> reliability. Then comes pleasing esthetics. Then comes
price,
> ease of use, etc.

You paraphrase me well, grasshopper.

>> Examples are size, cost, weight, appearance,
>> reliability, ease-of-use, and so on.

> Agreed. What are your priorities? Tell us.

First and foremost sound quality. But reliability is a close
second.

>> I don't recall reading any detailed descriptions of your
own
>> personal DBTs, Fella.

> Well take that up with your head-doctor.

IOW Fella, you are a no-show when it comes to personal
experience with that which you are critical of. That follows
from the fact that you have shown yourself to be highly
unfamiliar with a certain high end integrated amp whose name
you just dropped.

>> Actually, being a nerd is a pretty good way to have a
high
>> income.

> Was.

Is.

>>> You imagine your yamaha metallic sound $120 receiver as
>>> sounding the same as some $5000 BAT integrated amp, yes?

>> Interesting possibility, no?

> Interesting IMpossiblity, yes.

Since you exposed your ignorance about the BAT integrated
amp, this claim is obviously bogus.

>> BTW Fella, there don't appear to be any such things as
$120
>> Yamaha receivers being sold as new equipment.

> Why buy new?

Why quote prices of used equipment when they can vary all
over the map?

>> Does this mean
>> that the rest of your post is equally invalid?

> So you validate all the posts around here?

Sometimes its interesting to do a little fact-checking
Fella. See how nicely it exposed your ignorance and
posturing.

>>> That's how you are able to consume that edgy, glaringly
>>> digital, transistor sound you get from your piece of
shit
>> gear.

>> I think you really need to check your facts, Fella. The
>> $5995 BAT VK 300x integrated amplifier you mentioned has
a
>> lot of solid state and not a lot of tubes in it.  Check
out
>> the article below from their web site  - note the solid
>> state power amp heat sinks on each side, the absence of
>> any visible glass bottles, and the admission that the
only
>> tube that this BAT integrated amp might have is an
>> extra-cost option?

>> http://www.balanced.com/products/amp/Vk-300x/

<no relevant reply from Fella>