Re: HD RADIO is no worse than DAB or DRM radio

Article View: rec.audio.tech

Article #878

#878

From: SFTV_troy
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 23:16

16 lines
2209 bytes

Don Pearce wrote:
>
> What is the reason for your optimism? Every other advance in radio has
> been better by design, and demonstrated its improvement from day 1.
> Digital radio hasn't done that - it has been poor from day one, and to
> be better than its predecessor it will need to get a whole heap better
> What do you believe will be the basis of that improvement?

Well FM-Hybrid Digital *already* sounds better than the old analog
FM.  The AM also sounds better, albeit at the loss of hearing distant
stations (which can still be done via internet streaming).

Both of these will dramatically improve after the analog shutdown (FM
will have room for 300 kbps per station).

Technical Details

Message-ID: <1191107792.703860.186580@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail

References:

<1191065666.205537.159420@n39g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <1191096585.135753.167530@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <46ffb388.44729093@news.plus.net>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: fb1f8,428391383e1324a5
X-Google-Thread: 10a749,428391383e1324a5
X-Google-Thread: 114aac,cd4ad6cadcf2b245
X-Google-Thread: f7d8a,cd4ad6cadcf2b245
X-Google-Attributes: gidfb1f8,gid10a749,gid114aac,gidf7d8a,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From:  SFTV_troy <SFTV_troy@yahoo.com>
Newsgroups: rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.car,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast
Subject: Re: HD RADIO is no worse than DAB or DRM radio
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 16:16:32 -0700
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <1191107792.703860.186580@19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com>
References: <1191065666.205537.159420@n39g2000hsh.googlegroups.com>
   <1191096585.135753.167530@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com>
   <46ffb388.44729093@news.plus.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.249.100.9
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1191107793 16563 127.0.0.1 (29 Sep 2007 23:16:33 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 23:16:33 +0000 (UTC)
In-Reply-To: <46ffb388.44729093@news.plus.net>
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.7) Gecko/20070914 Firefox/2.0.0.7,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: 19g2000hsx.googlegroups.com; posting-host=24.249.100.9;
   posting-account=ps2QrAMAAAA6_jCuRt2JEIpn5Otqf_w0

Reply to Parent Message