Article View: rec.audio.tech
Article #879Re: HD RADIO is no worse than DAB or DRM radio
From: SFTV_troy
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 23:22
Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 23:22
34 lines
2871 bytes
2871 bytes
Tom wrote: > > ...So, too, does DRM benefit from said development, making it > possible to provide a digital carrier within LW,MW and SW channeling > plans. Thast said, I find it much less fatiguing to listen to a > program on an analog AM carrier than to the same program over DRM. I've never heard DRM. How does it sound, and why is it "fatiguing" to hear? > DAB...because of a concerted government, broadcaster and > manufacturing industry push, the likes of which we have not seen in > other countries. A stronger parallel can be drawn to the sizable > takeup of XMRadio and Sirius satellite services in the US and Canada - > the quality stinks but the program choice and wide ranging coverage > are unique. The quality stinks? Really? I listen to XM streams via the internet, and they sound just fine. Is there really that huge of a difference between Internet and Mobile Receiver? > I've been more impressed by synchronous AM demodulation of AM signals > than by a digital equivalent. It's a pity we could not get mass > manufacturing of synch AM radios and ultimately convert all AM > stations to USB with reduced carrier for power savings and reduced > interference. What's USB? What's synchronous AM demodulation? Thanks.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1191108136.459409.212620@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<1191065666.205537.159420@n39g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <1191096585.135753.167530@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <46ffb388.44729093@news.plus.net> <1191099764.677637.18050@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: fb1f8,428391383e1324a5 X-Google-Thread: 10a749,428391383e1324a5 X-Google-Thread: 114aac,cd4ad6cadcf2b245 X-Google-Thread: f7d8a,cd4ad6cadcf2b245 X-Google-Attributes: gidfb1f8,gid10a749,gid114aac,gidf7d8a,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: SFTV_troy <SFTV_troy@yahoo.com> Newsgroups: rec.audio.tech,rec.audio.car,rec.radio.shortwave,ba.broadcast Subject: Re: HD RADIO is no worse than DAB or DRM radio Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 16:22:16 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 35 Message-ID: <1191108136.459409.212620@50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> References: <1191065666.205537.159420@n39g2000hsh.googlegroups.com> <1191096585.135753.167530@d55g2000hsg.googlegroups.com> <46ffb388.44729093@news.plus.net> <1191099764.677637.18050@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.249.100.9 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1191108136 17631 127.0.0.1 (29 Sep 2007 23:22:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 23:22:16 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <1191099764.677637.18050@22g2000hsm.googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.7) Gecko/20070914 Firefox/2.0.0.7,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: 50g2000hsm.googlegroups.com; posting-host=24.249.100.9; posting-account=ps2QrAMAAAA6_jCuRt2JEIpn5Otqf_w0