Thread View: rec.audio.tech
7 messages
7 total messages
Started by Tom Nagy
Wed, 05 Oct 1994 14:44
Transformers in Audio Power Supplies
Author: Tom Nagy
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 1994 14:44
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 1994 14:44
15 lines
1269 bytes
1269 bytes
Hi everyone. Sorry about the crossposting, but I think this applies to all newgroups in question. In an amplifier circuit that I am currently fiddling with, the spec. says to use a toroidal transformer in the power supply. Why is this important? How would I be degrading the performance of the amp with a plain-vanilla transformer? Thanks in advance, Tom Nagy Please post responses, as I don't have email access.
Re: Transformers in Audio Power Supplies
Author: David Barrera
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 1994 15:15
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 1994 15:15
27 lines
1836 bytes
1836 bytes
In article <niall-0510941103460001@47.34.3.64>, niall@bnr.ca (Niall Gallagher) writes: > In article <36ue41$880@bcarh8ab.bnr.ca>, stud7b11@bcars564.bnrottawa wrote: > > > > In an amplifier circuit that I am currently fiddling > > with, the spec. says to use a toroidal transformer in the > > power supply. Why is this important? How would I be > > degrading the performance of the amp with a plain-vanilla > > transformer? > > Less flux leakage, most likely. The leakage could cause 60Hz noise to be > induced in the amplifier. Electronically, there is little difference. > > Niall > > -- > Niall Gallagher > niall@bnr.ca Try this! Take same turn toroidal transformer and the plain-vanilla one and measure the impediance. If your multimeter doesn't have that function then try getting a ruff estimate by setting the meter on the ohms measurement and get the greatest peak. Did that make any sense? Tell us your results, Dave
Re: Transformers in Audio Power Supplies
Author: Niall Gallagher
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 1994 16:03
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 1994 16:03
17 lines
1370 bytes
1370 bytes
In article <36ue41$880@bcarh8ab.bnr.ca>, stud7b11@bcars564.bnrottawa wrote: > In an amplifier circuit that I am currently fiddling > with, the spec. says to use a toroidal transformer in the > power supply. Why is this important? How would I be > degrading the performance of the amp with a plain-vanilla > transformer? Less flux leakage, most likely. The leakage could cause 60Hz noise to be induced in the amplifier. Electronically, there is little difference. Niall -- Niall Gallagher niall@bnr.ca
Re: Transformers in Audio Power Supplies
Author: Markus Imhof
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 1994 16:28
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 1994 16:28
44 lines
2791 bytes
2791 bytes
In article <36ue41$880@bcarh8ab.bnr.ca>, stud7b11@bcars564.bnrottawa wrote: > Hi everyone. Sorry about the crossposting, but I think > this applies to all newgroups in question. > > In an amplifier circuit that I am currently fiddling > with, the spec. says to use a toroidal transformer in the > power supply. Why is this important? How would I be > degrading the performance of the amp with a plain-vanilla > transformer? > > Thanks in advance, > > Tom Nagy > > Please post responses, as I don't have email access. There was a nice article about transformers in a German electronics magazine (elrad) some years ago, I'll try to remember the basic points: (all of the below concerns transformers with similar power ratings) -toroidal transformers have less stray field than simple EI-core transformers -toroidal transformers have a lower inner resistance (? I hope you know what I mean) than simple EI transformers. This leads to a faster charge-up of the capacitors, and to bigger problems when turning them on (a 500 VA toroidal transformer will surely blow the mains fuse, a similar EI-transformer probably won't) - you can overcome these problems by using an EI transformer of a higher power rating (more space, but probably still less money) - or, for best performance, you can use other rectangular type transformers (don't know the core types offhand), in conjunction with oriented sheets (? you know, the flat metal parts that make up the core). Price and weight, if produced in small series, is then roughly equivalent to toroidal transformers, but performance is supposed to be better (and they need more space). Sorry, can't find the exact refernce without the magazines - their electronic database just isn't what it is supposed to be :-( Bye Markus
Re: Transformers in Audio Power Supplies
Author: Dave Dal Farra
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 1994 21:48
Date: Wed, 05 Oct 1994 21:48
69 lines
4095 bytes
4095 bytes
Tom Nagy, stud7b11@bcars564.bnrottawa asks: > >In an amplifier circuit that I am currently fiddling >with, the spec. says to use a toroidal transformer in the >power supply. Why is this important? How would I be >degrading the performance of the amp with a plain-vanilla >transformer? Tom, Here's some wisdom guzzled from that Texas mickey of wisdom, the net. (yes I'm being sarcastic!) Dave Dal Farra (gpz750@bnr.ca) '83 GPz750/no fairing/no ABS/damn near no damping -----------------------------------------attached-----------> Subject: Toroids From: stephen.soyka@canrem.com (Stephen Soyka) Date: Thu, 4 Nov 93 02:24:00 -0400 As a general rule, toroids are never a no-no. The usual overiding factor in transformer topology is cost. Cost of the core, cost of the windings, set-up time etc. In general, toroids are very expensive due to the high labour costs involved. Every winding must be set up by hand becuase winding machines use a rotating shuttle which must be pre-loaded with the required length of conductor. I have a winding machine and can attest to the pain-in-the-ass nature of this process. That being said, a totoid is nothing more than a standard E-core wherein the magnetic path is a perfect circle. This drastically reduces the effects of eddy current losses and losses due to mutual inductance. I'm not sure what you are getting at in the area of frequency response and linearity. Aproperly designed XFMR is a properly designed XFMR. Although it is somewhat difficult to control the physical linearity of the actual winding, this is less of a problem with a toroid than with a standard E-core. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- --- From: dstock@hpqmoca.sqf.hp.com (David Stockton) Subject: Re: Torroids for tube amp supply? Date: Mon, 29 Nov 1993 16:37:44 GMT Toroidal transformers use tape-wound cores, explioting GOSS (grain-oriented silicon steel) which has better mag properties in one direstion than the other, The tape wound toroid ensures the mag field always is optimally oriented. Nearly all manufacturers have exploited this to the limit to run very high flux levels, allowing them to reduce the number of turns per volt. This can lead to a transformer that buzzes loudly, and also leads to turn-on surges. Overrunning the voltage soon leads to saturation and blown fuses (if you're lucky..) 44v windings may not have adequate or legal insulation at line voltage. European transformer shops sell 240 to 110v isolating transformers for operating power tools etc, running 110 into the 110 winding of one of these, and bridge-rectifying the 240v winding to get over 300v DC may be better 1) all windings running ar rated voltage, 2) isolting transformers have special "safety class' insulation. For a good amplifier, I personally would have a custom transformer done, with reduced flux level for acoustic noise reduction, and an inter-winding electrostatic shield to prevent interference from line transients. -----------------end attachement---------------------------------
Re: Transformers in Audio Power Supplies
Author: Brian E Rhodefer
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 1994 02:27
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 1994 02:27
18 lines
1597 bytes
1597 bytes
---------------- In article <36ue41$880@bcarh8ab.bnr.ca>, stud7b11@bcars564.bnrottawa (Tom Nagy) writes: |> |> Hi everyone. Sorry about the crossposting, but I think |> this applies to all newgroups in question. |> |> In an amplifier circuit that I am currently fiddling |> with, the spec. says to use a toroidal transformer in the |> power supply. Why is this important? Because audio electronics is a field more rife with superstition than any twelve "dial-a-Psychic" chat lines you could name. |> How would I be |> degrading the performance of the amp with a plain-vanilla |> transformer? You'd be making it cost less and have less snob value.
Re: Transformers in Audio Power Supplies
Author: John Guy
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 1994 14:29
Date: Thu, 06 Oct 1994 14:29
29 lines
2109 bytes
2109 bytes
In article <36ue41$880@bcarh8ab.bnr.ca>, stud7b11@bcars564.bnrottawa (Tom Nagy) writes: |> |> Hi everyone. Sorry about the crossposting, but I think |> this applies to all newgroups in question. |> |> In an amplifier circuit that I am currently fiddling |> with, the spec. says to use a toroidal transformer in the |> power supply. Why is this important? How would I be |> degrading the performance of the amp with a plain-vanilla |> transformer? |> |> Thanks in advance, |> |> Tom Nagy |> |> Please post responses, as I don't have email access. Yes, as another poster mentioned, there is a difference. Pound for pond, and cubic inch for cubic inch, the toroid is alot more transformer. Yes, there is a problem with inrush current, but just build a delay circuit that first connects the primary with a 50 ohm to 100ohm series resistor. Then shunt this resistor with a power relay when the cap voltage reaches 80 to 90 % of final value. This is easily done with a zener and series resitor giving base drive to a common emitter NPN, using the collector to pull the negative coil pin to a VCEsat above ground. While you are doing a circuit such as this, also add a delayed switching of the output relays. This avoids pops caused by transients in the amplifier supply line.
Thread Navigation
This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.
Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.
Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.
Back to All Threads