Article View: rec.games.backgammon
Article #149Cube action
From: Michael J Zehr
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 14:34
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 14:34
32 lines
1816 bytes
1816 bytes
13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
O O O O X O O
O O O O X O O
O O
O
X X X
X X X X X
X X X X X
12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
0-0 in a match to 5, X on roll, cube action?
I looked at this and thought that any 5 or 6 (20 rolls) followed by a
dance (25 rolls) and I would lose my market. Also, I thought there was
a good chance my opponent would drop.... So I doubled, rolled a 6-2 and
ran with 1 back checker, opponent rolled 43 to enter and hit loose, I
rolled 4-5 with which I hit and played 4-9 (figuring I didn't need a
third blot back, and expecting to win a race in the worse case) opponent
fanned, I rooled 11 to close him out and gammon him. ho-hum.
But I question whether my double was correct. As I said, my main reason
for doubling was I thought he would drop.
btw, I'm sure of all the pips in my home board, except maybe the spare
on my 6, and the points owned by each opponent, but I don't ecall
the exact placement of the spare checkers. How sensitive is this
position to those extra checkers?
-michael j zehr
PS. Marty? are you on-line yet? we miss you....
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Sep29.143407.11214@athena.mit.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!olivea!mintaka.lcs.mit.edu!bloom-picayune.mit.edu!athena.mit.edu!tadaShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!olivea!mintaka.lcs.mit.edu!bloom-picayune.mit.edu!athena.mit.edu!tada From: tada@athena.mit.edu (Michael J Zehr) Newsgroups: rec.games.backgammon Subject: Cube action Message-ID: <1992Sep29.143407.11214@athena.mit.edu> Date: 29 Sep 92 14:34:07 GMT Sender: news@athena.mit.edu (News system) Organization: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Lines: 32 Nntp-Posting-Host: e40-008-5.mit.edu