Article View: rec.games.backgammon
Article #150Re: Cube action
From: Phil Franklin
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 19:24
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 1992 19:24
45 lines
2615 bytes
2615 bytes
In article <1992Sep29.143407.11214@athena.mit.edu>, tada@athena.mit.edu (Michael J Zehr) writes: |> |> 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 |> O O O O X O O |> O O O O X O O |> O O |> |> O |> X X X |> X X X X X |> X X X X X |> 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 |> |> 0-0 in a match to 5, X on roll, cube action? |> |> I looked at this and thought that any 5 or 6 (20 rolls) followed by a |> dance (25 rolls) and I would lose my market. Also, I thought there was |> a good chance my opponent would drop.... So I doubled, rolled a 6-2 and |> ran with 1 back checker, opponent rolled 43 to enter and hit loose, I |> rolled 4-5 with which I hit and played 4-9 (figuring I didn't need a |> third blot back, and expecting to win a race in the worse case) opponent |> fanned, I rooled 11 to close him out and gammon him. ho-hum. |> |> But I question whether my double was correct. As I said, my main reason |> for doubling was I thought he would drop. |> |> btw, I'm sure of all the pips in my home board, except maybe the spare |> on my 6, and the points owned by each opponent, but I don't ecall |> the exact placement of the spare checkers. How sensitive is this |> position to those extra checkers? Michael, clearly your double was correct -- look at the results! ;-) Seriously, I think your analysis is accurate -- you have several immediate market losers (66, 65, 55, 32, 31, 21, and 11) plus a host of others if your opponent dances. Even without the spare checker on your 6-point you have 7 immediate market losers. Actually, it looks to me like you've already lost your market (which is what you thought). On the take side, there's little chance of a gammon here if O plays super-safe, and the race is even. However, as your results show, X is likely to gain outfield control, forcing O to leave blots against a 5-point board. - Phil
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Sep29.192404.19780@walter.bellcore.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!uwm.edu!rutgers!bellcore!walter!newsReferences:
<1992Sep29.143407.11214@athena.mit.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!uwm.edu!rutgers!bellcore!walter!news From: pbf@rruxc.cc.bellcore.com (Phil Franklin) Newsgroups: rec.games.backgammon Subject: Re: Cube action Message-ID: <1992Sep29.192404.19780@walter.bellcore.com> Date: 29 Sep 92 19:24:04 GMT Article-I.D.: walter.1992Sep29.192404.19780 References: <1992Sep29.143407.11214@athena.mit.edu> Sender: news@walter.bellcore.com Organization: Bellcore Lines: 45 Nntp-Posting-Host: heinlein.inoms.bellcore.com