Article View: rec.games.design
Article #496Re: FUDGE Dice
From: Eric C. Garrison
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 19:39
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 19:39
17 lines
1319 bytes
1319 bytes
In article <1992Dec21.013601.2373@oz.plymouth.edu> sos@oz.plymouth.edu (Steffan O'Sullivan) writes: >Whether I use the 2d6 or 2d10 as the main text, though, I >don't know - waiting for other votes and arguments to come in . . . I'd still vote for using d6's, since they are readily available and have a better "feel" to them physically and intuitively. I've always been partial to the simpler ideas, and to me the original idea of 2d6 is more elegant and simple. Besides, *my* simple game uses 6 sided dice only... :-) Though as it turns out I am having real trouble making up a simple combat system that goes with my mechanic. I may have to scrap it and just use FUDGE. :-) Eric
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<BzoEL2.9Cy@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!emory!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!usenet.ucs.indiana.edu!sopwith.ucs.indiana.edu!ericgReferences:
<1992Dec19.184005.216@oz.plymouth.edu> <1992Dec20.173202.20936@news.columbia.edu> <1992Dec21.013601.2373@oz.plymouth.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: rec.games.design Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!emory!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!usenet.ucs.indiana.edu!sopwith.ucs.indiana.edu!ericg From: ericg@sopwith.ucs.indiana.edu (Eric C. Garrison) Subject: Re: FUDGE Dice Message-ID: <BzoEL2.9Cy@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu> Sender: news@usenet.ucs.indiana.edu (USENET News System) Nntp-Posting-Host: sopwith.ucs.indiana.edu Organization: Indiana University References: <1992Dec19.184005.216@oz.plymouth.edu> <1992Dec20.173202.20936@news.columbia.edu> <1992Dec21.013601.2373@oz.plymouth.edu> Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 19:39:02 GMT Lines: 18