🚀 go-pugleaf

skinner@fuzzy.stdavids.picker.com (Andy Skinner) writes:
[proposal for all-out attack and all-out defense omitted]

Great!  I just added it, thanks!

>When do you think
>a person has done very well on a skill attempt?  When they roll double sixes?
>When they get a level+4 result (same except for modifiers)?  When they get
>a _relative_ degree of +4?  Usually you do well when you roll over the
>degree of the task or rolled degree of the opponent (really same thing, one
>is set and the other is rolled), but in combat you get a critical on 12 or 2,
>no matter how well the opponent did or what your degree is.  This isn't
>necessarily bad, but I'm just raising the question.  I don't know which one
>I would choose for the above Defense Only (or whatever you want to call it)
>option.

The way it is now, you only crit on a raw roll of 2 or 12.  Adding +4
relative degree sounds good to me - anybody else have an opinion on
this?
>
>Steffan, can you give us a hint on what you are thinking about different
>scales?  I can't come up with an objective form of this that doesn't involve
>multiplication, but that's what I think of when I hear the word "scale".

Hmm - I posted this two days ago - did it never get through?  It's true
no one commented on it, but I thought other posts of mine at that time
were being commented on.  The subject had the word Scale in it, I hope,
but I don't remember it precisely.  Did anyone see this?

-- 
  - Steffan O'Sullivan		         sos@oz.plymouth.edu