🚀 go-pugleaf

magnus@bark-fddi.ii.uib.no (Magnus Alvestad) writes:

>I think it's important that we keep this streamlined and reasonably
>simple, even at the complicated levels. The hieriarchy you propose
>looks reasonably good, but I think we'll let someone native fill in
>the right names.. ;-)

I wholeheartedly agree on this one :)

>Also remember than in such a hieriarchy, not all substats would have
>to be numeric, some could be boolean or text.

>-Magnus

True. The limit between a numeric and a boolean/text stat would need to
be set so, that all the stats that affect skills would be numeric (I
think that a boolean stat wouldn't be too easy to apply to a base
skill.) Some, mostly descriptive stats, would be better off as boolean
or text. We'd need to know something about the skill system before
drawing the actual lines (numeric/boolean/...,) though.
-- 
               Juha Liukkonen, aka jliukkon@cc.helsinki.fi
       University of Helsinki, Dept. of Paranormal Investigations
           "Trust me, I know what I'm doing." - Sledge Hammer