🚀 go-pugleaf

sorry i 'lost' the original post so am using this one...

In article <7p11tvl@rpi.edu> cleggp@aix.rpi.edu (Paul Jason Clegg) writes:
>Hmm...  Intriguing concept.  What happens if the modified result from the
>dice rolls moves you over or under the maximum results?
>
>Well, it's definitely a SIMPLE concept and easy to learn.  BUT it's very
>counter-intuitive for a GM to come up with stuff on the fly.  It's also
>very limited, because the results are limited to the seven results that 
>the stats/skills are defined as.
>

i *really* like this idea.  it is simple *and* i also think it is
pretty easy for the GM to do some on the go GM'ing.  I mean there
are adjectives for results so the GM can know exactly how good the 
player did and thus fill in the gaps with whatever he wants. and 
as for going over or under the seven, i think this could be a problem
but does anyone see a major badness about just saying if you go over
or under it just remains the best or worst?

>Will have to think on this concept a bit more before I can give a final
>opinion, but you definitely get marks for creative dice conventions!
>
>...Paul
>
>
>-- 
>+                +        +    +  + + +  +    +        +                +
>  Paul Clegg, cleggp@aix.rpi.edu.   Project Galactic Guide Coordinator.
>            System One RPG designer.   But generally unknown.
>+                +        +    +  + + +  +    +        +                +

this is a *really* nifty idea.
-- 
>>>-----------------------------------------------------------------------<<<
"It is human nature, I suppose to be futile and ridiculous"
"If the windmill should prove to formidable, I may see what can be done
           with the wind."            -Scaramouche (fks1@midway.uchicago.edu)