🚀 go-pugleaf

> Peter Brown writes:
>>
>>> Or do people really think we should fragment the group
>>> and form rec.games.programmer.pc?
>>Not a bad plan.  Supporters?

> You guys are missing the point.  If a game programming question is
> hardware specific, then it is actually just a hardware programming
> issue--and you'll get the best response if you treat it as such.
	
	I don't think we are missing the point, The IBM is such a wide 
based machine that specific gaming questions are often overlooked in 
the market.  Making another group may be the very thing to remedy the
problem, although I think it might be a bit extreme, 'cuz that would 
make this group dry up.  I have had the best response to posted questions
here, because it reaches the games programmers that DO IT!! :-P

> The Amiga camp is very good at this.  Comp.sys.amiga.programmer has
> recently had all sorts of questions about using dual playfields, custom
> copper lists, etc.--stuff that is certainly of use to game
> programmers.

		Well, No duh.  The Amiga is a gaming machine!  All its good
for is games!!!  (This is BLATANT FlameBait!! ;-))  All you do on the Amiga
is program games!  Ask Mike Schwartz???  (IS that spelled right?)

> I'm outta this one...
           We'll see...
> James Hague 
> exuhag@exu.ericsson.se

                                           wReam...
P.S.  Flaming is an art...