Article View: rec.games.programmer
Article #744Re: Splitting the Group
From: DreamWeaver
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 1992 03:56
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 1992 03:56
64 lines
3530 bytes
3530 bytes
> Cause, programming IBM_PC's belongs under comp.sys.ibm.programming or > some such group... ;-) True in theory ;) ... but comp.sys.msdos (or whatever) is in a constant battle with comp.lang.c (or pick your language) ... I track both groups and see people being kicked back and forth between then because "that's not a hardware problem ... it's a _language_ question ... go elsewhere" or "that's not a language question, it's a hardware-specific problem ... go somewhere else". There seems to be a great deal of interest in game programming ... at least enough to warrant a group of it's own. As for me, I feel that programming is programming ... irregardeless of the machine. If you're going to start splitting hairs about the hardware platform, then this group has no purpose and we should all go back to our own machines. I realize I'm probably going to fire up a flame war (I dropped into this thread late so I'm a bit out of touch) ... but I'd like to relay a story from my own experience a year ago: I used to be active on the TURBOC-L and TCPLUS-L mailing lists. At one time we had a lively discussion going on about how to handle EGA/VGA graphics. Nothing fancy, there was just a large group of people who needed help understanding the variety of manuals out there and a sample program or two to get them kicked in the right direction. I got the dubious position of being "resident guru" (or one of them). I offered to put together a series of "classes" or posts from the research I've been doing for the past few years ... and got a "great let's do it!" response ... ... until I was just about ready to start the posting ... ... when all of a sudden a bunch of lurkers jumped out with posts like "Ive just started watching this group and have been for a while and if all you're going to talk about is graphics I don't want to be here" and the like. I tried to be open and said (many times) that if the majority of the people aren't interested in this I won't do it (I don't like wasting bandwidth anymore than anyone else ... even though I'm doing it now :D). When I stopped talking about graphics, with a "ok, you want to talk about something else ... let's talk", the list went totally dead. The point: those who were whining the most were only interested in hearing what others had to say as long as those others could read their minds. My point: All machines (Amiga, Commodore, PC, Mac) have game capabilities and this seems to be a good place to talk about programming them. If someone wants help with a particular thing, they should ask ... but be prepared ... just because you complain about the group doing something you're not interested in doesn't mean that there are people reading who will be able to help you. If you don't believe me, try this: All IBM programmers will no longer talk about IBM development ... from now on we will discuss Amiga and only Amiga ... and see if it works. Sorry about the length ... this thread finally got to me. -Scotty
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Aug16.035614.1418@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mnemosyne.cs.du.edu!nyx!swalterReferences:
<1992Aug13.131813.29164@micor.ocunix.on.ca> <RBTvr*y83@aquariShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: rec.games.programmer Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mnemosyne.cs.du.edu!nyx!swalter From: swalter@nyx.cs.du.edu (DreamWeaver) Subject: Re: Splitting the Group Message-ID: <1992Aug16.035614.1418@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> Sender: usenet@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu (netnews admin account) Organization: University of Denver, Dept. of Math & Comp. Sci. References: <1992Aug13.131813.29164@micor.ocunix.on.ca> <RBTvr*y83@aquari Date: Sun, 16 Aug 92 03:56:14 GMT Lines: 65