Article View: rec.models.rc
Article #1927Re: Modified? (Was: Re: Misc R/C Car Questions)
From: Brent Hutto
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 22:23
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 1993 22:23
174 lines
12239 bytes
12239 bytes
In article <C19oy8.AGF@inews.Intel.COM>, dbraun@cad636.intel.com (Doug Braun ) writes:
>This makes me (an airplane person) wonder: Just what does "modified"
>mean (as applied to car motors)? Apparently if I talk a motor and
>modify it, it is not necessarily "modified". Similarly, I can buy
>a motor off the shelf, do nothing to it, and it can be "modified"
>anyway.
>
>Can anyone explain?
The designations "stock" and "modified" have historical denotations
that are no longer important. The only meaning they have nowadays is
as the names of two classes of racing at organized, santioned R/C car
racing events. There are several organizations that santion R/C car
races in the U.S., but I'll only discuss the one called ROAR for the
sake of simplicity. The others are real similar. Also, I'll only talk
about 1/10 scale electric races, not events held for 1/8-scale or
1/12-scale or glow-engined-powered cars.
If you go to an R/C car race put on by a group that uses the ROAR rules,
there will be a number of classes of competition. One way in which the
classes are split up is according to the types of R/C vehicles. Typical
are 2-wheel-drive buggy, 2-wheel-drive truck and 4-wheel-drive buggy
(this is at off-road races). The other way in which they are split up is
into "stock" and "modified". This designation is very confusing when you
first hear of it because you would think that the words "stock" and
"modified" refer to the vehicles. Not so. It is only the electric motor
that determines whether you are in a "stock" or "modified" classification.
So at a large off-road race, you might have as many as six classes of
competition, "2WD Stock", "2WD Mod", "4WD Stock", "4WD Mod", "Stock Truck"
and "Mod Truck". Actually, most races wouldn't have enough people in all
of these classes to race. The most popular classes around my neck of the
woods are "2WD Stock", "2WD Mod" and "Mod Truck", sometimes "Stock Truck"
and very, very occasionally, "4WD Modified". Anyway, if a racer enters
both "2WD Stock" and "2WD Mod" classes at a race, he/she will almost
always enter just one buggy and switch motors between races. She/he may
even use the same batteries in both classes (the rules for the two classes
do not distinguish w.r.t. battery type).
Now I'm going to finally answer your question about motors. When organized
racing of electric R/C cars first got started, the most commonly available
motor was made by the Mabuchi Co. in Japan and was designated by the motor
importers as a "540" motor. It was a three-slot permanant (ferrite) magnet
with 27 turns of (something like) 22-guage wire. The nominal voltage of
the "540" motor was (I think) 5 or 6 volts. In R/C car use, these motors
were fed with a nominal 7.2 volts at which they produced something on the
order of 40 or 50 watts of output. These motors cost the importers a
couple of dollars apiece and retailed for around $20. In order to use
these cheap motors but go faster, some people opened them up and removed a
few turns of wire from the armature. This made them draw more current and
turn much faster. Of course they also burned up after a while, but when
you are getting the motor full of dirt in your R/C car, it isn't going to
last forever anyway. Some of the real enthusiastic modifiers replaced the
steel or oilite bushings with little ball bearings for even better
performance. Of course, the bearings cost as much as the basic motor.
At any rate, if you push a 10- or 12-turn "modified" motor with 8.4 volts
and load it down enough, you can get over 150 watts of output at a current
draw of 30+ amps (that works out to somewhere in the 250-300 watt range
for the input power).
After a while, some "manufacturers" started buying Mabuchi motors direct
from the importers, removing all of the wire from the armature and putting
fewer turns of larger diameter wire to fill the armature. This made some
pretty strong running motors, especially the ball bearings ones. A really
nice "modified" "540" motor with a good winding and bearings would cost up
to $100 or so retail. Not bad for a reworked motor that left Japan costing
$2.00 or so. The current racing class designations date back to this point
in time (maybe, what, late 1970's? I wasn't doing R/C then). When ROAR
wrote its rule book, they specified that a "stock" motor had to have 27
turns on the armature, the wire had to be 22-gauge (or whatever, I don't
remember), the motor had to have bushings (no bearings), the can had to be
unopened once it left the manufacturer and [HERE'S THE IMPORTANT PART] the
motor had to be on an approved list of "manufacturers'. In fact, over time
the santioning body, ROAR, became basically a function of a certain group
of "manufacturers" (actually importers of Mabuchi motors).
At this point you're probably thinking that a "modified" motor is just any
motor that isn't on the approved list of "stock" motors. WRONG! The only
"modified" motor you can run in a ROAR-sanctioned race is a Mabuchi "540"
can with a three-slot Mabuchi "540" armature (it can have ball bearings
and any size wire) bought from the same list of importers. Nowadays there
are many small businesses who buy cans and armatures from one of the ROAR
importers and wind their own wire onto the armature and put their own
label on the can, but they can't actually design and manufacture a motor
that is allowed to be used in sanctioned competition.
There's a guy who all the electric airplane guys know named Bob Boucher
who owns Astro Flight. Astro Flight makes a wide variety of modern motors
including an "05" size that is very similar in appearence to the Mabuchi
"540". The Astro "05" is superior in every way to the Mabuchi "540" and
retails for the same price as a top-line "modified" Mabuchi. The big
difference is that it costs Bob Boucher more than 10 bucks to build one
of his "05"'s, so there's not nearly as much profit in building 10-dollar
motors as there is in importing crummy $2.00 ferrite "540-type" motors
and reselling them. There is also the fact that Bob Boucher isn't one of
the guys who built an organization like ROAR. As an aside, it turns out
that Bob Boucher was influential in supporting the organizations that
santion R/C drag races and truck pulls. In those types of competition,
and an Astro Flight motor is "the one to beat".
So what is boils down to is this. Organized, "big-time" R/C car racing is
basically a sport that is run by a cartel of motor importers (who also
build car kits and accessories, and so forth). If you want to race in
their races, you have to play by their (ROAR or NORRCA) rules and pay
their price for their motors. I have no problem with this. It's due to
the promotion that these companies have put into this "sport" that I find
enough people interested in R/C car racing in my town to have organized
races every week.
What I object to is the fact that hell is going to freeze over before
organized racing allows me to use a sturdy, well-built motor that is
going to last a long time and run the car as fast as I would like to go.
The people I race with every week seem to be convinced that just because
they pay around $50.00 for a motor, it is really "state-of-the-art" and
nothing better exists in the whole universe. In reality, they are using
motors that were desgined as cheap throwaways nearly 20 years ago. If Bob
Boucher could sell Astro Cobalt 05 motors in 1/10th of the quantity that
Trinity sells Mabuchi ferrites, you could buy a motor for $50.00 that
would produce 50% more output on the same amount of battery juice as a
current top-line ROAR-legal modified and would last almost forever with
a reasonable amount of care.
Finally, a few comments about "stock" class competition as it now exists.
The alleged reasons for having a "stock" class are: 1) everyone's motor
will have the same power, making competition more even, and 2) to keep
the cost of racing down. Setting up this sort of class works for a while,
but years ago it developed to the point where the "stock" motors on the
approved list are purpose built. If you showed up to race with a Mabuchi
"540" motor (like comes with many R/C car kits) in the "stock" class at
your local track, your car couldn't do 10 laps in the same four minutes
that the other cars to do 15. To compete, you had better buy a "real"
"stock" motor for around 20 bucks. OK, you do that and now you can do 12
laps in the time the other "stock"-class cars to 15. Even among the
faster cars, some of them can pull away by 10 feet on a 100-foot straight
compared to the others. Hmmm, it seems like some of these "stock" motors
are more equal than others.
To really compete in the ROAR "stock" class, you will have to buy one of
the most optimized ROAR-legal motors available and then you will have to
use a variety of means to make the motor you race even faster. The oldest
way to do this is to buy your stock motors by the dozen, test them on a
dynomometer and throw away all but the two most powerful ones. Then, you
take these two motors and use a variety of means (some against the rules,
some not against the rules and some undetectable, so the rules don't
matter anyway) to advance the commutator timing as much as 45 degrees or
so past the "neutral point". Now retest these two motors and pick the
best one for the main event and the second best one for the qualifiers.
Now you might ask why you need two motors. The reason is that motors
which have been "jacked up" this way only perform at their peak for a
dozen or so four-minute runs. Since they are sealed closed (according to
the ROAR "stock" rules) after those dozen or soruns, YOU THROW THEM AWAY!
Well, if you add this up, you've just spent around $200 (for the dozen
motors plus aftermarket brushes and springs) in order to get two very
good motors. After about a month of weekly racing, both of these motors
will be well past their prime and you can start all over again with a new
batch of "stock" motors. This is absolutely no exaggeration of the
lengths the top two or three "stock"-class racers at any track will go to
in order to make sure that they have the fastest cars in any given race.
Since these are all good drivers and they have the fastest cars, the
so-called "stock" class boils down to a race between the guys with a
couple of hundred bucks a month to spend on motors. Anyone who isn't this
"serious" can always hope to win the B-Main or, on a good day, come in
second or third in the A-Main.
Probably no one has read the far. I hope Mr. Braun found the answer to
his original question in here somewhere. If anyone *has* read this far,
then, ummm, Thanks For Your Support. Just remember "Life is Serious,
but Racing is Fun".
-------------------------------
Brent Hutto
hutto@SMTC.engr.scarolina.edu
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan22.222328.12638@usceast.cs.scarolina.edu>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!bogus.sura.net!opusc!usceast!SMTC.engr.scarolina.edu!HUTTOReferences:
<1jndudINNi9a@flop.ENGR.ORST.EDU> <1993Jan22.134127.1906@usceast.cs.scarolina.edu>,<C19oy8.AGF@inews.Intel.COM>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: rec.models.rc Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!bogus.sura.net!opusc!usceast!SMTC.engr.scarolina.edu!HUTTO From: hutto@SMTC.engr.scarolina.edu (Brent Hutto) Subject: Re: Modified? (Was: Re: Misc R/C Car Questions) Message-ID: <1993Jan22.222328.12638@usceast.cs.scarolina.edu> Sender: usenet@usceast.cs.scarolina.edu (USENET News System) Reply-To: hutto@smtc.engr.scarolina.edu Organization: NIST Southeast Manufacturing Technology Center References: <1jndudINNi9a@flop.ENGR.ORST.EDU> <1993Jan22.134127.1906@usceast.cs.scarolina.edu>,<C19oy8.AGF@inews.Intel.COM> Date: Fri, 22 Jan 93 22:23:28 GMT Lines: 174