Re: Royal .46 engine

Article View: rec.models.rc

Article #1928

#1928

From: Lyman Lew
Date: Wed, 06 Jan 1993 01:02

11 lines
1022 bytes

In article <1993Jan5.150720.12883@crd.ge.com> souza@crd.ge.com writes:
>
>I just bought a Royal Signature .46 BB ABC engine. Seems like a reasonably
>well-made copy of an OS .46SF for half the price. I haven't run it yet,
>but I noticed that the piston fit inside the cylinder is not nearly as
>tight as my other ABC engines (Royal .25 and Magnum .40GP), although it
>is definitely tightest near top-dead-center. Is this likely to be a
>problem? Any opinions on this engine?

That's the way ABC motors are typically set up. Just follow the break-in
procedure and the motor should do fine.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <24622@hacgate.SCG.HAC.COM>

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!wupost!usc!hacgate!4ccvw70!lew

References: <1993Jan5.150720.12883@crd.ge.com>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!wupost!usc!hacgate!4ccvw70!lew
From: lew@4ccvw70.scg.hac.com (Lyman Lew)
Newsgroups: rec.models.rc
Subject: Re: Royal .46 engine
Message-ID: <24622@hacgate.SCG.HAC.COM>
Date: 6 Jan 93 01:02:34 GMT
References: <1993Jan5.150720.12883@crd.ge.com>
Sender: news@hacgate.SCG.HAC.COM
Reply-To: lew@4ccvw70.UUCP (Lyman Lew)
Organization: Hughes Aircraft Co., El Segundo, CA
Lines: 20

Reply to Parent Message