🚀 go-pugleaf

Oh dear God, more on the O'Connor brouhaha.  Mr. O'Connor writes, in
criticism of Terry/Angharad:

>I think it's presumptious of you to answer for Hossein. If I
>had people speaking for me on my reasons to sdo things, when I
>was perfectly able to do so myself, I'd feel offended, I think.

I didn't respond to your posting myself for the same reason that I seldom
talk to walls -- I don't think they're listening.  Terry, on the other
hand, found the need to answer a question, which _you_ asked in your
posting, by displaying the selective memory you have of your own diatribes.
I thought it was pissing in the wind, myself, but she's a nicer person
than I am.  I am warmed by your concern that I would be offended at
Terry speaking for me.  I'm not offended at all, and not just because she's
my wife, but because I trust her judgment infinitely more than I would
ever think to trust yours.

Again, quoting Terry, Mr. O'Connor writes:

>] In Service to the Society,
>
>Not with this post, you're not.

You certainly talk the talk, but I've not seen one iota of evidence that
you walk the walk.  You've insulted Cariadoc, you've insulted Angharad/Terry,
want to insult anybody else who's been around the Society longer and
contributed more to the Society than you have?

It seems to me that all you have brought to this forum is a pathetic
bravado looking for a fight.  I'm not going to give you one.  I don't
fight with children.  It's why I didn't answer your previous posting
and why, after this correction of your assumption of my offense, I shan't
try to argue with a solipsist.

Hossein/Greg

Hossein/Greg