🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

2 total messages Started by Beth Appleton Wed, 27 Jan 1993 12:49
Heraldic Questions...
#6275
Author: Beth Appleton
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 1993 12:49
18 lines
1300 bytes
 CX> from--but what do you say
 CX> to Miklos or Vajk, two serious, authenticity-minded 
 CX> people who are forbidden to
 CX> pass heraldry appropriate to their persona?  You're 
 CX> making them combine French
 CX> heraldry with their Hungarian everything else, and 
 CX> creating the very problem
 CX> you're trying to solve. 
 I don't *think* this is the exact problem.  It is actually possible to 
 create armory quite consistant with the current rules, which also 
 reflects national character.  We are denying the Hungarians one 
 specific charge -- which is only found in their culture -- not the 
 remainder of their armory.  Check the device of Jan w'Orzeldom (sp) 
 for polish-style armory which is completely legal within the current 
 rules of the College of Arms, for example.
      Gwenllian Cwmystwyth

 * Origin: Herald's Point * Steppes/Ansteorra * 214-699-0057 (1:124/4229)
Re: Heraldic Questions...
#6281
Author: Josh Mittleman
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 1993 16:11
28 lines
2355 bytes
Greetings from Arval!  Gwenllian wrote:

> We are denying the Hungarians one specific charge -- which is only found
> in their culture -- not the remainder of their armory. 

I'm afraid you are incorrect.  Lord Laurel discussed this charge in the
cover letter to his latest LoAR and observed that the green mount on a blue
field is found throughout Europe.  He returned a submission using it,
despite extensive documentation.  His argument, which I find moderately
more palatable than Tadhg's (though no more convincing), is that he must be
careful not to allow too many exceptions to the standard style rules, lest
the rule system become too complex to be usable.  This is the "poor, dumb,
local herald" argument, which starts by insulting our officers and populace
in assuming that they are too stupid to understand that a complicated art
cannot be reduced to idiot-proof rules, and continues to insult the entire
Society by concluding that the only solution is to reduce everything to the
lowest common denominator.

Your statement, Gwenllian, is also somewhat deceptive, as it suggests that
the elimination of the green mount + blue field is only a minor
inconvenience for SCAdians with Hungarian personae.  That combination
occurs in well over 80% of all recorded Hungarian armory (according to
research by Stefan Laskowski).  The effect is comparable to telling people
with English persona that they MUST put color on color: It forbids them the
most appropriate practice for their personae.

===========================================================================
Arval Benicoeur                                       mittle@watson.ibm.com
Thread Navigation

This is a paginated view of messages in the thread with full content displayed inline.

Messages are displayed in chronological order, with the original post highlighted in green.

Use pagination controls to navigate through all messages in large threads.

Back to All Threads