🚀 go-pugleaf

"LeRoy Blue" <leroyblue@billon.net> wrote in message 
news:bp56l49o0rq4s2nm3tnvijltsuhdktrqea@4ax.com...
> On Mon, 22 Dec 2008 12:44:19 -0500, "John Donovan"
> <5l40sdm02@sneakemail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>"Bill Z." <nobody@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message
>>news:87tz8wiw44.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net...
>>> LeRoy Blue <leroyblue@billon.net> writes:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, 20 Dec 2008 23:17:32 -0800, nobody@nospam.pacbell.net (Bill
>>>> Z.) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>LeRoy Blue <leroyblue@billon.net> writes:
>>>>>
>>>>>No, I think you lie - you made up that 70 percent thing and the
>>>>>CDC data simply is not consistent with it - the actual numbers
>>>>>are lower.
>>>>
>>>>    2005 Data directly from a CDC study read it and weep::
>>>
>>> Why should I "weep" when the CDC data backs up what I said?
>>>
>>>>     * Since the beginning of the epidemic, an estimated 517,992 MSM
>>>> (452,111 MSM and 65,881 MSM who inject drugs) had received a diagnosis
>>>> of AIDS, accounting for 68% of male adults and adolescents who
>>>> received a diagnosis of AIDS and 54% of all people who received a
>>>> diagnosis of AIDS [1].
>>>
>>> Yep, just what I pointed out - you gave a number that was too high.
>>>
>>>> So, I was off by three percentage points that well with in the margin
>>>> for error.
>>>
>>> No it isn't - you get that sort of error when you have around 1000
>>> cases as it follows a Poisson distribution, and the standard deviation
>>> (the statistical error) is the square root of that number. For a mean
>>> of 500,000 cases, the statistical error (which measures the random
>>> change from year to year) is 0.14 percent.
>>>
>>>> While I can't find the cite yet I know that CDC has upped
>>>> that figure to 70% since 2005
>>>
>>> You can't find a citation but "know" anyway?  And you expect us to
>>> believe you?
>>>
>>>>>>>Why not just admit what the actual numbers are?  That isn't asking
>>>>>>>a lot from you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  Why not accept the data from the CDC rather than continue to blow
>>>>>> smoke up your own ass.
>>>>>
>>>>>Why do you lie so much?
>>>>
>>>> It very clear who is lying  and it's not me. I back up what I say,
>>>> you, on the other hand, whine a lot.
>>>
>>> It is very clear you are lying.  One lie you tell repeatedly is to
>>> attribute all male-to-male sexual contact cases to homosexuals while
>>> ignoring bisexuals.
>>
>>Bill, he doesn't even read the stuff he cuts/pastes.
>>
>>He finds something he things supports his point of view...and posts it 
>>here.
>>
>>If he can't be bothered thinking on his own, then why bother with all his
>>cut/paste crap...
>
> All CDC data that mentions MSM include bisexuals in the numbers. Wake
> up, boys.

Please learn to uise your mind.

Maybe youa re just some right wing nutcase who has given up thinking by 
following around the likes of Jimmy Swaggart in place of a thought process.
(BTW....Jimmy Swaggart is a good example of a hetero, isn't he?  The world 
would be so much better if we were all like him, huh?)

Or maybe you never got out of the trailer park for an education, but 
cut/paste is a lazy man's way to argue.

Your teacher would give you an F.

Plus some of the cut/paste crap you post is even contradictory to what you 
are trying to say.