Article View: sac.general
Article #200Re: Vote NO on Prop Eight
From: A Browne
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 03:53
Date: Tue, 04 Nov 2008 03:53
29 lines
2892 bytes
2892 bytes
>>> The majority rules by way of the content of the states Constitution. >>> Live with it. >> >>Your little one-line answers don't do much to advance your argument. >> >>Civil & human rights are not up for popular vote via the state >>constitution. > > > If that's what you think then I suggest you educate yourself by > looking closely at what a number of states have done to prevent > homosexual marriage -- they voted to change or include the one man one > woman marriage definition in their STATE CONSTITUTION. See how that > works, boy... However...BOY....the state constitution cannot be amended to contradict itself. If the State Supreme Court find that this new definition is simply a way to deny civil rights to a segment of the population, then it can still be struck down. If 51% of the people voted that Blacks are not defined as citizens and are thereby denied the right to vote....then the State Stupreme Court can strike down the prop. You might educate yourself to see how some states have NOT been able to prevent gay marriage.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<tNPPk.6765$be.479@nlpi061.nbdc.sbc.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!headwall.stanford.edu!newshub.sdsu.edu!flpi089.ffdc.sbc.com!prodigy.net!flpi088.ffdc.sbc.com!prodigy.com!flpi107.ffdc.sbc.com!nlpi061.nbdc.sbc.com.POSTED!3bd16feb!not-for-mailReferences:
<c0c5fef993b772586ad491e239a5debe@dizum.com> <ge88u2$75q$1@snarked.org> <871vy0mekt.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <geahc1$e50$2@snarked.org> <87iqrbt7xu.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <9f0fc340-a744-43d3-83c2-3392ace12879@u29g2000pro.googlegroups.com> <8763n9x55g.fsf@pacbell.net> <c06lg4hal7ik8j1sl7e5oj87n3ad3arfuv@4ax.com> <PSOOk.5390$c45.1221@nlpi065.nbdc.sbc.com> <jflsg4tt6p4gbtneo7pqdkgeuotk9d8gqk@4ax.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: f824f,af9442ae69b6f64f X-Google-Thread: 102fd5,af9442ae69b6f64f X-Google-Thread: 107d03,af9442ae69b6f64f X-Google-Attributes: gidf824f,gid102fd5,gid107d03,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!headwall.stanford.edu!newshub.sdsu.edu!flpi089.ffdc.sbc.com!prodigy.net!flpi088.ffdc.sbc.com!prodigy.com!flpi107.ffdc.sbc.com!nlpi061.nbdc.sbc.com.POSTED!3bd16feb!not-for-mail From: "A Browne" <Rpalino@mailandnews..com> Newsgroups: sac.general,ba.general,ba.politics,la.general,scruz.general References: <c0c5fef993b772586ad491e239a5debe@dizum.com> <ge88u2$75q$1@snarked.org> <871vy0mekt.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <geahc1$e50$2@snarked.org> <87iqrbt7xu.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net> <9f0fc340-a744-43d3-83c2-3392ace12879@u29g2000pro.googlegroups.com> <8763n9x55g.fsf@pacbell.net> <c06lg4hal7ik8j1sl7e5oj87n3ad3arfuv@4ax.com> <PSOOk.5390$c45.1221@nlpi065.nbdc.sbc.com> <jflsg4tt6p4gbtneo7pqdkgeuotk9d8gqk@4ax.com> Subject: Re: Vote NO on Prop Eight Lines: 31 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350 X-RFC2646: Format=Flowed; Original Message-ID: <tNPPk.6765$be.479@nlpi061.nbdc.sbc.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 67.91.233.69 X-Complaints-To: abuse@prodigy.net X-Trace: nlpi061.nbdc.sbc.com 1225771225 ST000 67.91.233.69 (Mon, 03 Nov 2008 23:00:25 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2008 23:00:25 EST Organization: at&t http://my.att.net/ X-UserInfo1: [[PAPDCA[S@[RV@YCPKL^PTDEZXXPGLLEXRZKB]MPXHBTWICYFWUQBKZQLYJX\_ITFD_KFVLUN[DOM_A_NSYNWPFWNS[XV\I]PZ@BQ[@CDQDPCL^FKCBIPC@KLGEZEFNMDYMKHRL_YYYGDSSODXYN@[\BK[LVTWI@AXGQCOA_SAH@TPD^\AL\RLGRFWEARBM Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2008 22:53:02 -0500