Re: Vote NO on Prop Eight

Article View: sac.general

Article #208

#208

From: D. Stussy
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 20:33

24 lines
2174 bytes

"Bill Z." <nobody@nospam.pacbell.net> wrote in message
news:871vy0mekt.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net...
> "D. Stussy" <spam@bde-arc.ampr.org> writes:
> > "Nomen Nescio" <nobody@dizum.com> wrote in message
> > news:c0c5fef993b772586ad491e239a5debe@dizum.com...
> >> Please Vote No on Proposition Eight.
> >>
> >> Don't allow discrimination against
> >> anyone!
> >
> > Vote Yes on Prop 8.  They already have "equal rights" - it's called the
> > "registered domestic partnership."  We don't need more laws.
>
> If your opinion really is "We don't need more laws," then you should
> vote *against* Proposition 8, which creates a new law. :-)

Actually, it doesn't. All it does is clarify a definition.

> Humor about poor reasoning aside, the California Supreme Court
> addressed the issue of whether a domestic partnership conveys
> the same rights as marriage and concluded that it does not.
> Read the decision for details.

Courts can be wrong.

Technical Details

Message-ID: <geahc1$e50$2@snarked.org>

Path:

arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.ainex.net!news.snarked.org!not-for-mail

References: <c0c5fef993b772586ad491e239a5debe@dizum.com> <ge88u2$75q$1@snarked.org> <871vy0mekt.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net>

Show Full Headers

Complete Article Headers

X-Google-Thread: f824f,af9442ae69b6f64f
X-Google-Thread: 107d03,af9442ae69b6f64f
X-Google-Thread: 10d50a,af9442ae69b6f64f
X-Google-Attributes: gidf824f,gid107d03,gid10d50a,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.ainex.net!news.snarked.org!not-for-mail
From: "D. Stussy" <spam@bde-arc.ampr.org>
Newsgroups: sac.general,ba.general,ba.politics,la.general,scruz.general
Subject: Re: Vote NO on Prop Eight
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 13:33:11 -0700
Lines: 26
Message-ID: <geahc1$e50$2@snarked.org>
References: <c0c5fef993b772586ad491e239a5debe@dizum.com> <ge88u2$75q$1@snarked.org> <871vy0mekt.fsf@nospam.pacbell.net>
Reply-To: "D. Stussy" <replies@newsgroups.kd6lvw.ampr.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-71-118-52-187.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net
X-Trace: snarked.org 1225312449 14496 71.118.52.187 (29 Oct 2008 20:34:09 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: newsmaster@snarked.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2008 20:34:09 +0000 (UTC)
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1478
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1478

Reply to Parent Message