🚀 go-pugleaf

On Dec 3, 3:30 pm, nob...@nospam.pacbell.net (Bill Z.) wrote:
> kujebak <kuje...@eudoramail.com> writes:
> > Bill Z. wrote:
> >> kujebak <kuje...@eudoramail.com> writes:
> >> > How could it not be?
>
> >> My point was that what you wrote, regardless of what you probably
> >> meant, was wrong.  If you weren't a jerk (as you turned out to be)
> >> you would have merely posted a correction: your use of the word
> >> "entirely" meant that the risk for any other type of sexual activity
> >> was zero and that simply isn't the case.
>
> >> You claimed to have some health care experience. If so, you should
> >> have realized that posting misleading information that unknowledgable
> >> members of the public might see is not a good idea, particularly
> >> when you state such experience up front.
>
> >> If you weren't so bigoted (you obviously are) you would have realized
> >> what I was saying - it had nothing to do with "lifestyles" real or
> >> imagined.
>
> > There is nothing "misleading" in what I said. I merely cut
> > through decades of willful misinformation piled upon this
> > subject. Your refusal to deal with facts underlying this and
> > other topics ...
>
> What a moron!  The facts are that the transmission rate for HIV per
> sex act is nonzero for oral sex and for heterosexual intercourse (for
> either partner).  What was misleading about what you said was your
> statement that "Normal transmission of the HIV virus between
> individuals is entirely dependent on a specific type of sexual
> contact," and in English that use of "entirely" and "specific type"
> implies a risk of zero for anything else.
>
> Those are the facts - the rates have been measured - and it is *you*
> who are refusing to deal with that.
>
> It's real simple.  Look up the data in some tables provided by
> health-care professionals and note that certain numbers are not
> zero.  That's all there is to it.  If you want some sort of
> discussion about various individuals' sex lives, try somewhere else,
> like a dating web site or something.  I have no interest in that
> sort of a discussion.
>
> I'm not sure what your hangup is, but your inability to understand
> a very simple comment really makes me doubt your intelligence.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

The chance of our civilization being snuffed by a giant
meteor is nonzero as well. Does anybody give a fuck
about that? If you really have no other point, why didn't
you say so at the top to spare me this excruciating
exchange?