🚀 go-pugleaf

Alan Crozier wrote:
> "Matt Giwer" <jull43@tampabay.REMover.rr.com> wrote in message
> news:M92%f.164732$g47.24935@tornado.tampabay.rr.com...
> 
>>Tom McDonald wrote:
>>
>>>Matt Giwer wrote:
>>>
>>>>Seppo Renfors wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>Doug Weller wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>On 3 Apr 2006 06:36:51 -0700, in sci.archaeology, Tom McDonald wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Seppo Renfors wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Doug Weller wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>[..]
>>>>>
>>>>>>Seppo's really getting crazier and crazier.  Obviously I've never promoted
>>>>>>a Nazi site, nor is suggesting that someone had bad judgment a smear
>>>>>>(actually the suggestion originally came from a KRS supporter).
>>>>>
>>>>>LIAR! You know you have posted links to a site dealing in Nazi
>>>>>propaganda material!
>>>>>
>>>>>>I had no idea who Lenoir was when I replied, but whoever she/he is, it's
>>>>>>clearly not hyperoglyphe (funny, every post I could find by hyperoglyphe
>>>>>>that mentions Jews is anything but anti-Semitic, it couldn't be that Seppo
>>>>>>is wrong about him, eh?).
>>
>>>>>Oh dear..... so NAZI ideology is ONLY relevant to JEWS, is it? Perhaps
>>>>>Doug Weller is resorting to "white" washing the NAZIS now - of course
>>>>>they hated BLACKS as well
>>
>>>>Actually I can't find one word in their literature on the subject of Blacks. If
>>>>you can please post the URLs.
>>
>>>>There were so few in Germany they were treated mostly as a novelty. As Jesse
>>>>Owens observed, he didn't have to ride in the back of the bus. Yes, I know
>>>>Hitler did not congratulate him but neither did FDR. Jimmy Carter was the first
>>>>to issue the traditional invitation to the White House to congratulate him.
>>
>>>1. Specify the black people the German Nazis considered 'Herrenfolk.'
>>
>>You do not get away with changing the subject in the middle of a thread.
>>
>>You have presented not one word from the Nazis about Blacks. Please do so
>>before you continue.

> From Mein Kampf

> "If the development of France in the present style were to be continued for three hundred
> years, the last remnants of Frankish blood would be submerged in the developing
> European-African mulatto state. An immense self-contained area of settlement from the Rhine
> to the Congo, filled with a lower race gradually produced from continuous bastardization."

> "The French people, who are becoming more and more obsessed by negroid ideas, represent a
> threatening menace to the existence of the white race in Europe, because they are bound up
> with the Jewish campaign for world-domination. For the contamination caused by the influx of
> negroid blood on the Rhine, in the very heart of Europe, is in accord with the sadist and
> perverse lust for vengeance on the part of the hereditary enemy of our people, just as it
> suits the purpose of the cool calculating Jew who would use this means of introducing a
> process of bastardization in the very centre of the European Continent and, by infecting the
> white race with the blood of an inferior stock, would destroy the foundations of its
> independent existence."

> Doesn't sound as if the author had a high opinion of black Africans. Apologies for having to
> quote this filth, but Matt's baseless claims need to be corrected.

	It reads as Jews bringing them to Germany which is related to bringing American 
jazz muscians to perform. There was one Jazz Musician interred during the war 
and he reported working and living freely with modest reporting restrictions, 
less than would be expected in time of war. Consider it a lesson in political 
rhetoric versus the facts.

	As for the "French people" after he died the renowned Fredric the Great's bones 
were returned to Paris where he was born for burial. That was the first Reich in 
Hilter's counting of his being the third. You cannot understand this without 
knowing the European view of history at the time. The French were Franks and no 
longer Germanic. A people's view is a people's view and he was a politician not 
an educator. The rules are always different.

	Yes the then current interest in Algeria and the later withdrawal were of 
interest at the time. In fact the current conflict between Muslim and Jewish 
ex-Algerians in France is based up the Jewish ones having sided with France. 
That is a fact. It has nothing to do with religion rather who sided with the 
atrocities of the French against liberation.

	You cannot pull words out of no where PARTICULARLY in politics and pretend to 
understand them. Take for example conservative and liberal. Twenty years ago 
they were effectively opposite political agendas in the US and Canada.

	But what does he say? If it were to continue for 300 years it would be a 
problem. You can find respected French saying it is going too far today. If it 
continues into the far, far future in even our times then yes he was looking at 
a North African Europe and saying it is not a good idea. That is populist 
politics. The entire US is currently polarized on that issue regarding Mexicans 
as an immediate issue not in 300 years.

	But as I said way up front, you cannot tell what in the fuck he is talking 
about without studying the time and even then it might not be clear. So please, 
as you accept his on face value, please tell me exactly what it refers to on the 
other side of the Rhine.

>>And I have never found herrENvolk in their literature only herrNvolk which has
>>a different meaning.

> Is this online edition of Mein Kampf wrong? It finds Herrenvolk but not Herrnvolk
> http://www.adolfhitler.ws/lib/books/dkampf/dkampf.htm
> Anyway, what difference does it make?

	As I said look for images of pages from their publications not translations. 
Herren is plural of Herr. How does that fit with what you wish it to mean? 
Masters Race?

-- 
The Gaza Strip is about to become the vector of Avian Flu for all of Europe
because Israel has cut off the funds Palestine needs to deal with it.
	-- The Iron Webmaster, 3608
  nizkor http://www.giwersworld.org/nizkook/nizkook.phtml
  Larry Shiff http://www.giwersworld.org/computers/newsagent.phtml a8