🚀 go-pugleaf

Yuri Kuchinsky wrote:
> 
> Ross Clark (drc@antnov1.auckland.ac.nz) wrote on Wed, 21 Oct 1998 14:54:20 +1300:
> 
> : Yuri, you'll have to be more careful if you are going to try to score
> : cheap points. A search of deja news indicates that the paper cited by
> : Bernard has not been mentioned by anyone previously in this discussion --
> : not by you, not by Peter, not by anybody else.
> 
> My mistake, Ross, sorry. I was careless in my reply. Actually Bernard
> posted the most recent ref of which I was unaware.
> 
> Of course, knowing Bernard's track record, I will not expect him to
> apologize for his false accusation that I did not supply adequate
> references previously. I certainly supplied such refs.
> 
> : Now about the content of these papers: You will stop saying they "support
> : Heyerdahl" now, won't you?
> 
> Yes, you're right again. To be more precise, I should have said "Dr.
> Cann's research provides support for Heyerdahl". This is the situation as
> I see it.
> 

Well, the distinction between "supports Heyerdahl" and "provides support 
for Heyerdahl" may need some explaining.

Ross Clark