Article View: sci.astro
Article #4779Re: pi (was Re: Is lightvelocity accelerating?)
From: Erik Max Francis
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 1995 04:22
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 1995 04:22
24 lines
2490 bytes
2490 bytes
son3776@utdallas.edu writes:
> The fact that we can't measure it to total accuracy does not exclude it
> from being a physical constant.
>
> Elementary charge is a physical constant with a computational value of
> 1.60e-19C and a *best* (1986) value of 1.60217738e-19C with an
> uncertainty of .30 parts per million. Even though we still haven't
> measured this to an exact accuracy, we still consider it to be a physical
> constant . . . so saying that we can't measure pi to a certain degree of
> accuracy does not mean that pi is not a physical constant.
But the fact that we can talk about the "correct" value of pi (the one
you get through several series) indicates that it is indeed a
mathematical constant. What's the _correct_ value of e (the quantum
of electric charge)? Of course, there isn't one, because it's a
physical constant, which must be measured rather than calculated.
Erik Max Francis, &tSftDotIotE ...!uuwest!alcyone!max max@alcyone.darkside.com
San Jose, CA ... GIGO, Hg, Omega, Universe, Psi ... ICBM: 37 20 N 121 53 W _
H.3`S,3,P,3$S,#$Q,C`Q,3,P,3$S,#$Q,3`Q,3,P,C$Q,#(Q.#`-"C`- ftmfbs kmmfa mc2 / \
Omnia quia sunt, lumina sunt. ("All things that are, are lights.") -><- \_/
"We all may have come on different ships, but we're in the same boat now."
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<RZPa3c5w200w@alcyone.darkside.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!nntp.gmd.de!news.rwth-aachen.de!news.rhrz.uni-bonn.de!RRZ.Uni-Koeln.DE!uni-duisburg.de!zib-berlin.de!news.mathworks.com!uhog.mit.edu!news.mtholyoke.edu!news.byu.edu!netline-fddi.jpl.nasa.gov!goonsquad.spies.com!mirror2.apple.com!times.aux.apple.com!mumbo.apple.com!gallant.apple.com!apple.com!uuwest!alcyone!maxReferences:
<3kkvt7$h5j@utdallas.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: ff8cf,7d15a3c97705a5a5 X-Google-Attributes: gidff8cf,public X-Google-Thread: f44bc,7d15a3c97705a5a5 X-Google-Attributes: gidf44bc,public X-Google-Thread: fa827,7d15a3c97705a5a5 X-Google-Attributes: gidfa827,public X-Google-Thread: 1038c2,7d15a3c97705a5a5 X-Google-Attributes: gid1038c2,public X-Google-Thread: f74ae,7d15a3c97705a5a5 X-Google-Attributes: gidf74ae,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 1995-03-20 20:22:14 PST Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!nntp.gmd.de!news.rwth-aachen.de!news.rhrz.uni-bonn.de!RRZ.Uni-Koeln.DE!uni-duisburg.de!zib-berlin.de!news.mathworks.com!uhog.mit.edu!news.mtholyoke.edu!news.byu.edu!netline-fddi.jpl.nasa.gov!goonsquad.spies.com!mirror2.apple.com!times.aux.apple.com!mumbo.apple.com!gallant.apple.com!apple.com!uuwest!alcyone!max From: max@alcyone.darkside.com (Erik Max Francis) Newsgroups: sci.astro,sci.skeptic,alt.sci.physics.new-theories,swnet.sci.astro,fj.sci.astro Subject: Re: pi (was Re: Is lightvelocity accelerating?) Message-ID: <RZPa3c5w200w@alcyone.darkside.com> Date: Mon, 20 Mar 95 20:22:14 PST References: <3kkvt7$h5j@utdallas.edu> Organization: &tSftDotIotE Lines: 24