Article View: sci.bio.botany
Article #351Re: What is the optimal wavelength of light for growing plants (cacti indoors in a northern illinois climate)?
From: Stan Goodman
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 1997 00:00
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 1997 00:00
49 lines
3189 bytes
3189 bytes
In message <pspopeXSPM-1310971949310001@165.124.30.53> - pspopeXSPM@shopchicago.com (Scott) writes: I am trying to accelerate the growth of my baby cacti by increasing their light exposure with fluorescent lamps. I am wondering what would the optimal wavelength for promoting growth (i.e. photosynthesis). My question, in part, stems from interest in growth lamps. I have seen inexpensive (<$10) incandescent "plant lamps". However, fluorescent lamps produce 4x visible light than their incandescent counterparts. BTW, I don't want to use fluorescent plant lamps because I do not want to use special fixtures. Modern compact fluorescent lamps work quite well. Pivotal question: Which is better for growing cacti: incandescent plant lamps or compact fluorescent lamps? Fluorescent lamps are better. The light output of incandescent lamps is what is called "black-body radiation"; at the temperatures of incandescent lamps, this sort of spectrum will be heavy in red, infra-red, and longer wavelengths. The spectrum of the fluorescent powders with which the inside of fluorescent lamps is coated are more sclosely matched to the visible spectrum: this only one reason why fluorescent lamps give more light, watt for watt than incandescent lamps, and why they run cooler and consequently last longer. Plants, for the most part, are uninterested in red and infra-red radiation. They do their photosynthesis thing with the light from the sun; in order to do this most efficiently, they are most responsive to light at the wavelengths of the peak output from the sun, namely the middle of the visible spectrum, i.e. green -- not coincidently the color of peak visual acuity of the human (among others) eye, which is as efficient as it is because it, like plants, is at its best for the wavelengths most available in sunlight. The same evolutionary pressure has made eyes and plants most sensitive to green light, which is why the grass is green. %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%% % Stan Goodman % % Qiryat Tiv'on % % ISRAEL % %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<61vlk3$6k5$2@news.NetVision.net.il>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<pspopeXSPM-1310971949310001@165.124.30.53>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1028fe,28594e47bdf67208 X-Google-Attributes: gid1028fe,public X-Google-Thread: 115fe3,28594e47bdf67208 X-Google-Attributes: gid115fe3,public X-Google-Thread: 10a56c,28594e47bdf67208 X-Google-Attributes: gid10a56c,public X-Google-Thread: f4acb,28594e47bdf67208 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4acb,public X-Google-Thread: 10bcbe,28594e47bdf67208 X-Google-Attributes: gid10bcbe,public From: Stan Goodman <sgoodman@netvision.net.il> (Stan Goodman) Subject: Re: What is the optimal wavelength of light for growing plants (cacti indoors in a northern illinois climate)? Date: 1997/10/14 Message-ID: <61vlk3$6k5$2@news.NetVision.net.il> X-Deja-AN: 280469497 References: <pspopeXSPM-1310971949310001@165.124.30.53> Reply-To: sgoodman@netvision.net.il X-Complaints-To: usenet@news.NetVision.net.il X-Trace: news.NetVision.net.il 876829123 6789 (None) 199.203.102.190 Organization: NetVision LTD. Newsgroups: sci.bio.botany,sci.engr.lighting,bionet.plants,sci.agriculture,rec.gardens