Article View: sci.bio.botany
Article #352Re: What is the optimal wavelength of light for growing plants (cacti indoors in a northern illinois climate)?
From: Bart Z. Lederman
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 1997 00:00
Date: Tue, 14 Oct 1997 00:00
49 lines
3409 bytes
3409 bytes
In article <61vlk3$6k5$2@news.NetVision.net.il>, Stan Goodman <sgoodman@netvision.net.il> (Stan Goodman) writes: >In message <pspopeXSPM-1310971949310001@165.124.30.53> - >pspopeXSPM@shopchicago.com (Scott) writes: > >I am trying to accelerate the growth of my baby cacti by increasing their >light exposure with fluorescent lamps. I am wondering what would the > >Plants, for the most part, are uninterested in red and infra-red radiation. >They do their photosynthesis thing with the light from the sun; in order to do I used to grow plants under lights, and have read many reference books (and even own a few), and all of them indicate that the above statement is wrong. Plants are sensitive to red and near infrared. The balance between shorter and longer wavelengths (plants are relatively insensitive to green) will have an effect on how the plant grows. Too much of one or the other will cause the plant either to be very short and 'stocky' or very long and 'gangly'. At the moment, however, I don't remember which excess causes which effect. The so called 'plant lights', which give off purple (actually magenta) light may make your plants look nice, but they tend not to be very efficient compared with regular fluorescents. However, fluorescents tend not to have enough red and near infra-red compared with daylight. Of course, flourescents have been greately improved in the past few decades, but I suggest doing what most of the better books I've read on the subject recommend. This is to use the most efficient normal white flourescents you can get that are on the 'cool' side (used to be 'cool white'), and add 10% of the wattage in incandescents to make up the missing red and near-infrared. So if you are using four 40 watt CW lamps, you would add about 16 watts of incandescent, or say two 7 or 10 watt lamps. Keep in mind that many plants are very sensitive to the ratio of light to dark that they get, and if you give them too much light or too little light in each 24 hour cycle you won't get optimum results. -- B. Z. Lederman Personal Opinions Only Posting to a News group does NOT give anyone permission to send me advertising by E-mail or put me on a mailing list of any kind. Please remove the "DISABLE-JUNK-EMAIL" if you have a legitimate reason to E-mail a response to this post.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<620h1f$k71$1@sniff.shr.dec.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!unknown!not-for-mailReferences:
<pspopeXSPM-1310971949310001@165.124.30.53> <61vlk3$6k5$2@news.NetVision.net.il>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 1028fe,28594e47bdf67208 X-Google-Attributes: gid1028fe,public X-Google-Thread: 115fe3,28594e47bdf67208 X-Google-Attributes: gid115fe3,public X-Google-Thread: f4acb,28594e47bdf67208 X-Google-Attributes: gidf4acb,public X-Google-Thread: 10a56c,28594e47bdf67208 X-Google-Attributes: gid10a56c,public X-Google-Thread: 10bcbe,28594e47bdf67208 X-Google-Attributes: gid10bcbe,public From: lederman@star.enet.dec.DISABLE-JUNK-EMAIL.com (Bart Z. Lederman) Subject: Re: What is the optimal wavelength of light for growing plants (cacti indoors in a northern illinois climate)? Date: 1997/10/14 Message-ID: <620h1f$k71$1@sniff.shr.dec.com> X-Deja-AN: 280536817 References: <pspopeXSPM-1310971949310001@165.124.30.53> <61vlk3$6k5$2@news.NetVision.net.il> Reply-To: lederman@eisner.decus.DISABLE-JUNK-EMAIL.org Distribution: world Organization: Personal Opinions Only Newsgroups: sci.bio.botany,sci.engr.lighting,bionet.plants,sci.agriculture,rec.gardens