Article View: sci.bio
Article #1472Re: Are Humans Naturally Monogamous?
From: mike.siemon
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 1990 18:45
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 1990 18:45
18 lines
1448 bytes
1448 bytes
In article <1990Nov29.171325.8319@watserv1.waterloo.edu>, alternat@watserv1.waterloo.edu (Ann Hodgins) writes: > Evidence from before the time of written records strongly suggests that > women were much freer. For instance, before the time of the monotheistic > father gods, desert women could dismiss a lover or husband by simply > closing the flap or her personal tent to him three nights in a row. Excuse me, but exactly WHAT evidence could you possibly have to conclude this "before the time of written records?" I see no way of getting any oral accounts of the "good old [or bad old :-)] days" to yield such a conclusion (except by projection on the part of the concluder) nor any relevant physical data that might apply. -- Michael L. Siemon In so far as people think they can see the m.siemon@ATT.COM "limits of human understanding", they think ...!att!sfsup!mls of course that they can see beyond these. standard disclaimer -- Ludwig Wittgenstein
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1990Nov29.184550.26876@cbnewsm.att.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!cbnews!cbnewsm!mlsReferences:
<1990Oct24.175532.9407@pmafire.UUCP> <15490@netcom.UUCP> <1990Nov29.171325.8319@watserv1.waterloo.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.bio Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!cbnews!cbnewsm!mls From: mls@cbnewsm.att.com (mike.siemon) Subject: Re: Are Humans Naturally Monogamous? Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories Distribution: na Date: Thu, 29 Nov 90 18:45:50 GMT Message-ID: <1990Nov29.184550.26876@cbnewsm.att.com> Summary: say, what? References: <1990Oct24.175532.9407@pmafire.UUCP> <15490@netcom.UUCP> <1990Nov29.171325.8319@watserv1.waterloo.edu> Lines: 18