Article View: sci.bio
Article #1473Re: Are Humans Naturally Monogamous?
From: Graydon
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 1990 19:24
Date: Thu, 29 Nov 1990 19:24
19 lines
1448 bytes
1448 bytes
To use perhaps excessively computational metaphors, people have almost
no ROM (if it's instinctive, it's present in more or less the same percentage
of the population in any given area throughout the species), and a lot of
EPROMs. You *can* wipe the EPROMS and load them from RAM, but it is a lot
of work (~= pain, heartache, thought, time, energy) and is probably not
worth it for most folk. If one's EPROMs make one sufficently unhappy,
however (survivors of all sorts of violence, etc.), it *is* worth it.
*Marriage*, of some description, is common to most human cultures past
a certain level (villagers, instead of pure hunter/gatherer, and up).
The forms of the marriage are so clearly relatable to economic factors
that it seems silly to describe monogamy as 'instinctive'.
Graydon
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Monete me si non anglice loquebar. saundrsg@qucdn.queensu.ca
saundrsg@qucdn.bitnet
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<90333.142415SAUNDRSG@QUCDN.QueensU.CA>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!qucdn!saundrsgReferences:
<5869@crash.cts.com> <1990Nov29.180827.10813@watserv1.waterloo.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!qucdn!saundrsg Organization: Queen's University at Kingston Date: Thursday, 29 Nov 1990 14:24:14 EST From: Graydon <SAUNDRSG@QUCDN.QueensU.CA> Message-ID: <90333.142415SAUNDRSG@QUCDN.QueensU.CA> Newsgroups: sci.bio,soc.men,soc.women,soc.singles Subject: Re: Are Humans Naturally Monogamous? References: <5869@crash.cts.com> <1990Nov29.180827.10813@watserv1.waterloo.edu>