Article View: sci.bio
Article #471Re: Female Orgasms and the G-spot
From: Peter Merel
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 1989 08:49
Date: Thu, 26 Oct 1989 08:49
18 lines
1495 bytes
1495 bytes
In article <1947@moondance.cs.uq.oz> ant@batserver.cs.uq.oz writes: >pete@basser.oz (Peter Merel) writes: >Unfortunately I am not prepared to spend the time that you have looking for >articles to the contrary. I think however I could find an equally convincing >array of articles denying the existance of the G-Spot. It is the same with >anything that is not completely understood in science I suppose. Read 'em again, ant. Those articles DO deny the existance of a G-spot. If you mean articles denying vaginal erotic sensitivity - I couldn't find any. I still haven't looked up Hoch & Alzate in the SCI, but will do sometime in the next week. For CC: the fluid I observed was clear, more viscous than I would expect urine to be, and without any of the attendant odour of urine. The females in question were healthy specimens as far as they or I know. -- "A dog don't want a bone / That's why he buries it" - James Brown pete@basser.oz.AU
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<2669@basser.oz>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!munnari.oz.au!basser!peteReferences:
<2599@basser.oz> <1701@moondance.cs.uq.oz> <2610@basser.oz> <1902@moondance.cs.uq.oz> <2662@basser.oz> <1947@moondance.cs.uq.oz>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!utzoo!utgpu!jarvis.csri.toronto.edu!mailrus!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!munnari.oz.au!basser!pete From: pete@basser.oz (Peter Merel) Newsgroups: sci.bio,aus.followup Subject: Re: Female Orgasms and the G-spot Message-ID: <2669@basser.oz> Date: 26 Oct 89 08:49:11 GMT References: <2599@basser.oz> <1701@moondance.cs.uq.oz> <2610@basser.oz> <1902@moondance.cs.uq.oz> <2662@basser.oz> <1947@moondance.cs.uq.oz> Organization: Dept of Comp Sci, Uni of Sydney, Australia Lines: 18