Article View: sci.chem
Article #2250Re: equilibrium const for disulfide bond formation
From: Jenn
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:19
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:19
41 lines
3160 bytes
3160 bytes
DK wrote: > In article <1168370284.242721.50740@o58g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>, juicymixx@mailinator.com wrote: > > > >Hello, > > > >This is a pretty simple question; however I can't seem to find an > >answer to it. I have a rather small protein (60 amino acids) in which > >I've mutated in a single cysteine for labeling purposes. There are no > >other cysteines in the protein. Additionally the protein is normally > >unstructured in solution (that is in 30uM phosphate buffer at 25C, > >there is no significant structure). Recently we've noted that after > >purifying the protein (but before labeling it) we appear to have some > >dimer formation which isn't seen in the wild type protein. > > > >I was just wondering what the equilibrium constant (reaction rate, > >etc.) for intermolecular disulfide formation from 'free' cysteine would > >be (or better yet, cysteine in a polymer/peptide/protein). Someone > >has probably already done this experiment, however I'm not sure of > >where to look for this number... > > There is no single number to answer your question. "It depends". > Lots of factors will influence propensity of your cysteins dimerizing: > their precise pKa (depends on envirnoment; put a Lys next to it and > it will be A LOT more reactive), degree of solvent exposure and > steric accessibility, amound of O2 and pH of your buffer, > the amount of traces of metals, etc, ect. Just work as fat as you can, > perform labeling and, if the experiment demands it, purify monomer > away from dimer on gel-filtration or by affinity chromatography > against the probe. > > DK Thanks for the reply. I understand that the local environment around the CYS makes a difference (as well as the bulk environment). Is there any literature (or a journal article) that expands on this? Someone must have tried to measure the reaction rate under some certain condition...? Thanks again.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1168449594.204158.85610@i39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!i39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<1168370284.242721.50740@o58g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <BYWoh.720$Td7.489@newsfe05.lga>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: f4886,d004336369bd29fc X-Google-Thread: fd9c4,d004336369bd29fc X-Google-Attributes: gidf4886,gidfd9c4,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!i39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "Jenn" <juicymixx@mailinator.com> Newsgroups: sci.chem,bionet.molbio.proteins Subject: Re: equilibrium const for disulfide bond formation Date: 10 Jan 2007 09:19:54 -0800 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 42 Message-ID: <1168449594.204158.85610@i39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> References: <1168370284.242721.50740@o58g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <BYWoh.720$Td7.489@newsfe05.lga> NNTP-Posting-Host: 159.178.50.186 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1168449596 16442 127.0.0.1 (10 Jan 2007 17:19:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:19:56 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Opera/9.02 (Windows NT 5.1; U; en),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: i39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=159.178.50.186; posting-account=SyvTBg0AAADnGBdcS29dbbceqTkuZ0z5