🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.chem
Article #2250

Re: equilibrium const for disulfide bond formation

#2250
From: Jenn
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:19
41 lines
3160 bytes
DK wrote:
> In article <1168370284.242721.50740@o58g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>, juicymixx@mailinator.com wrote:
> >
> >Hello,
> >
> >This is a pretty simple question; however I can't seem to find an
> >answer to it.   I have a rather small protein (60 amino acids) in which
> >I've mutated in a single cysteine for labeling purposes.   There are no
> >other cysteines in the protein.   Additionally the protein is normally
> >unstructured in solution (that is in 30uM phosphate buffer at 25C,
> >there is no significant structure).   Recently we've noted that after
> >purifying the protein (but before labeling it) we appear to have some
> >dimer formation which isn't seen in the wild type protein.
> >
> >I was just wondering what the equilibrium constant (reaction rate,
> >etc.) for intermolecular disulfide formation from 'free' cysteine would
> >be (or better yet, cysteine in a polymer/peptide/protein).   Someone
> >has probably already done this experiment, however I'm not sure of
> >where to look for this number...
>
> There is no single number to answer your question. "It depends".
> Lots of factors will influence propensity of your cysteins dimerizing:
> their precise pKa (depends on envirnoment; put a Lys next to it and
> it will be A LOT more reactive), degree of solvent exposure and
> steric accessibility, amound of O2 and pH of your buffer,
> the amount of traces of metals, etc, ect. Just work as fat as you can,
> perform labeling and, if the experiment demands it, purify monomer
> away from dimer on gel-filtration or by affinity chromatography
> against the probe.
>
> DK


Thanks for the reply.   I understand that the local environment around
the CYS makes a difference (as well as the bulk environment).   Is
there any literature (or a journal article) that expands on this?
Someone must have tried to measure the reaction rate under some certain
condition...?

Thanks again.
Technical Details
Message-ID: <1168449594.204158.85610@i39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!i39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
References: <1168370284.242721.50740@o58g2000hsb.googlegroups.com> <BYWoh.720$Td7.489@newsfe05.lga>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: f4886,d004336369bd29fc
X-Google-Thread: fd9c4,d004336369bd29fc
X-Google-Attributes: gidf4886,gidfd9c4,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!i39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail
From: "Jenn" <juicymixx@mailinator.com>
Newsgroups: sci.chem,bionet.molbio.proteins
Subject: Re: equilibrium const for disulfide bond formation
Date: 10 Jan 2007 09:19:54 -0800
Organization: http://groups.google.com
Lines: 42
Message-ID: <1168449594.204158.85610@i39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>
References: <1168370284.242721.50740@o58g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>
   <BYWoh.720$Td7.489@newsfe05.lga>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 159.178.50.186
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Trace: posting.google.com 1168449596 16442 127.0.0.1 (10 Jan 2007 17:19:56 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2007 17:19:56 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: G2/1.0
X-HTTP-UserAgent: Opera/9.02 (Windows NT 5.1; U; en),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe)
Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info: i39g2000hsf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=159.178.50.186;
   posting-account=SyvTBg0AAADnGBdcS29dbbceqTkuZ0z5