Article View: sci.cognitive
Article #315Re: Theories of meaning not relying solely on sym
From: Richard Caley
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 17:34
Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 17:34
19 lines
1371 bytes
1371 bytes
In article <1992Nov18.134406.17573@husc3.harvard.edu>, Michael Zeleny (mz) writes: mz> You are not even close. The point is that a *correct* and mz> *comprehensive* normative description will _ipso facto_ have full mz> descriptive adequacy. And a contradiction implies anything, and if you hypothesise a completely implausible object you can ascribe whatever properties you like to it. mz> Ah, "philosophy at Harvard"... thank you for answering my query about mz> the state of scholarship at the University of Geneva [etc.] Ad hominem as `rationalism'. Hm, what a novel idea. Can we have sticking your tongue out at people as nominalism next. :-) -- rjc@cogsci.ed.ac.uk _O_ |<
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<RJC.92Nov19173454@daiches.cogsci.ed.ac.uk>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!edcastle!edcogsci!cogsci!rjcReferences:
<1992Nov17.092016.28202@news.unige.ch> <1992Nov17.221542.17555@husc3.harvard.edu> <1992Nov18.132612.8892@news.unige.ch> <1992Nov18.134406.17573@husc3.harvard.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!mcsun!uknet!edcastle!edcogsci!cogsci!rjc From: rjc@cogsci.ed.ac.uk (Richard Caley) Newsgroups: sci.cognitive,sci.philosophy.tech,sci.lang Subject: Re: Theories of meaning not relying solely on sym Message-ID: <RJC.92Nov19173454@daiches.cogsci.ed.ac.uk> Date: 19 Nov 92 17:34:54 GMT References: <1992Nov17.092016.28202@news.unige.ch> <1992Nov17.221542.17555@husc3.harvard.edu> <1992Nov18.132612.8892@news.unige.ch> <1992Nov18.134406.17573@husc3.harvard.edu> Sender: rjc@cogsci.ed.ac.uk Organization: Human Communication Research Center Lines: 19 In-reply-to: zeleny@husc10.harvard.edu's message of 18 Nov 92 18:44:04 GMT