Article View: sci.crypt
Article #130Re: privacy
From: Paul Wallich
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1992 22:09
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1992 22:09
35 lines
2551 bytes
2551 bytes
In <1992Oct27.231241.23112@shearson.com> pmetzger@snark.shearson.com (Perry E. Metzger) writes: >The only thing needed to change the FBI's proposed built-in tap >capability from something restrained by the need for court orders into >something used as an instrument of opression and terror by a >dictatorship would be a change of attitude towards the equipment and a >little coup d'etat -- the technology would be sitting right there in >their hands. The only thing needed to change the encrypted list of all >private keys in the country into a similar instrument would be a >similar change in attitude, but this time you could likely read >people's old messages as well! This, of course, ignores the day to day >abuse of our privacy that will doubtless occur. (I will point out for >completeness that when our society is fully disarmed by the anti-gun >nuts, all that will be required for the criminals to trample over us >and loot at will is an emergency (like the recent hurricane in >Florida) and all that will be required for our whole society to be >held captive is a military coup. I realize, of course, that some >people disagree with this last point, but then again some people like >Dorothy Denning seem to think we should hand over to "trusted third >parties" copies of our private keys, on the basis that "we can trust >them -- after all, the government will protect us.") Just in case people are wondering about a particular example of this kind of thing already on the books, consider that people have died because telephone companies keep records of long distance calls. I have been told, in fact, that this is the major reason a number of european phone systems don't do itemized phone bills -- people considered the hassle of not being able to get misbillings corrected a reasonable trade for life and liberty. (Which is pretty good, considering that in the U.S. law enforcement doesn't even need a warrant to place a pen register on your phone and records every number you dial -- including voicemail passwords and such) paul
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Oct28.220919.18376@panix.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!iggy.GW.Vitalink.COM!cs.widener.edu!eff!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!gatech!news.ans.net!cmcl2!panix!pwReferences:
<1992Oct27.231241.23112@shearson.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.crypt,comp.org.eff.talk Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!iggy.GW.Vitalink.COM!cs.widener.edu!eff!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!gatech!news.ans.net!cmcl2!panix!pw From: pw@panix.com (Paul Wallich) Subject: Re: privacy Message-ID: <1992Oct28.220919.18376@panix.com> Date: Wed, 28 Oct 1992 22:09:19 GMT References: <1992Oct27.231241.23112@shearson.com> Organization: Trivializers R Us Lines: 35