🚀 go-pugleaf

jim.wenzel@grapevine.lrk.ar.us (Jim Wenzel)  writes:

>     However, recently (yesterday) I had  the opportunity to speak with a
>     law enforcement official who had quite a different view.
>     He was calling  from California in order to pick  up the pgp program
>     from us. Seems that they are on the case of a molestor who encrypted
>     his information using PGP. If they  can't crack it the molestor will
>     more than  likely walk due to  lack of evidence. This  has caused me
 
Not everyone who is accused is guilty.  If the police couldn't
find sufficient evidence elsewhere -- the testimony of victims,
child pornography in the suspect's house, etc -- why would they
or you expect there to be evidence in his computer?  If you
robbed a bank, molested a child, or committed some other crime,
would you rush home, boot your computer and type in a detailed
description of what you had just done?!?!  Please, examine the
underlying assumptions which you are harboring.
 
===
Rick Harrison