Article View: sci.crypt
Article #2222Force-Feeding New Technology to Spies
From: Christopher_C_Lapp
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 02:28
Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1992 02:28
23 lines
1732 bytes
1732 bytes
What was the significance of Coventry in cryptographic history? It shows that an adversary can safeguard their secrets with the home team, long after the adversary has been totally compromised. The German Luftwaffe was free to bomb Coventry and kill British citizens despite the British Intelligence Service's possession of a complete decrypt of their plans. I wonder how many Coventrys are occurring today, even with knowledge of silicon warfare, value-based cryptography, and value-based normative empathetic warfare. The greatest danger in giving new ideas to a secret organization, is that the new ideas will sit idle in some bureaucrat's file cabinet, gathering dust, while good people die in battlefields and dark alleys across the globe. The way to prevent this from happening is to make sure that the ideas are transmitted on a "risky" medium, so that the transmission is considered "hot", and the transmitter is never fully and completely investigated. If the British had had a fire under their collective behinds, and felt that despite allowing Coventry to be bombed, someone might tell the Germans all about the whereabouts of the missing enigma, then perhaps the British would have saved their fellow countrymen, on the grounds that the beans might be spilled anyway. This is the tactic to use when presenting new technology to a secret organization.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<71764@cup.portal.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!portal!cup.portal.com!Christopher_C_LappShow Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!portal!cup.portal.com!Christopher_C_Lapp From: Christopher_C_Lapp@cup.portal.com Newsgroups: sci.crypt Subject: Force-Feeding New Technology to Spies Message-ID: <71764@cup.portal.com> Date: Tue, 15 Dec 92 18:28:43 PST Organization: The Portal System (TM) Distribution: usa Lines: 23