Article View: sci.crypt
Article #2223Re: PKP/RSA comments on PGP legality
From: David Sternlight
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 20:31
Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 20:31
46 lines
2798 bytes
2798 bytes
Vesselin posts a long message, which contains a misstatement of fact and a number of claims. Let me treat the first, and then see if I can cut through the second. I don't argue the law and then if that doesn't work, argue ethics. Vesselin cannot have been reading my posts very carefully if he thinks so. In the U.S., I argue the law, since the issue is patents and that RSA has one, and that the Munitions act covers imports as well as exports. In Europe, where I have never argued RSA's patents apply, and I have never argued the U.S. Munitions laws apply, I argue the ethics of taking an invention without compensation. Like most such discussions here, these arguments have evolved as we learn from each other. That argument also applies in the U.S. It's not a fallback position, but two separate sets of arguments for two separate situations--the one in Europe and the one in the U.S. Now let me try to cut through a lot of what seems to me to be posturing and rationalization about the legality of PGP in Europe. By starting a separate topic, I asked the public question about Munitions and crypto laws in European countries, and everybody who was so vociferous about their "rights" to use PGP there immediately fell silent. However, I received several e-mail responses from those who hadn't participated so far, pointing out, with details, that the crypto and munitions laws in most European countries (maybe not Finland or Bulgaria--dunno) are much more stringent than in the U.S. (We may never find out about the crypto laws in Finland, since Jyrki says he's put me on his kill list.) Thus I suggest for Vesselin's (and others') consideration that they may be violating the laws of the countries they are in by using PGP without (for example) getting permission from the appropriate Minister, as in France. If true, that would make all the posturing about how the U.S. Munitions laws don't apply to Europe and hence PGP is o.k. completely bogus. In the case of Vesselin, specifically, I suggest he check out the German crypto and Munitions laws, since that's where he apparently has PGP on a computer. If he's planning to use it in Bulgaria, he may also wish to check out those laws. David
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Dec22.203159.23174@netcom.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!strnlghtReferences:
<bontchev.724946717@fbihh> <1992Dec21.194928.2449@netcom.com> <bontchev.725036591@fbihh>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.crypt,alt.security.pgp Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!haven.umd.edu!darwin.sura.net!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!strnlght From: strnlght@netcom.com (David Sternlight) Subject: Re: PKP/RSA comments on PGP legality Message-ID: <1992Dec22.203159.23174@netcom.com> Organization: Netcom - Online Communication Services (408 241-9760 guest) References: <bontchev.724946717@fbihh> <1992Dec21.194928.2449@netcom.com> <bontchev.725036591@fbihh> Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 20:31:59 GMT Lines: 46