🚀 go-pugleaf

In article <C0F2v9.2w4@wimsey.bc.ca> markh@wimsey.bc.ca (Mark C. Henderson) writes:
>The following just came in on rsaref-users mailing list.
>>RSAREF is now available via anonymous FTP to 'rsa.com'. Along with
ftp rsa.com
user anonymous
cd rsaref/dist/930105
get all

Now, who has acted against the ITAR. Me, as supposedly doing the 3 operations 
mentioned above, or rsa.com, giving me uncontrolled access to software which
seems to be covered by the ITAR ? Sorry for rising this political question in
sci.crypt, but I am really wondering about this. Note that I supposedly did 
this from Europe. And note too, that I supposedly did not read the README in 
rsaref/dist which contains license agreements and restrictions.

Anybody following up to this please take care to note, that even if I 
would supposedly get rsaref/ripem, i would not use it, so don't discuss
my supposed morality or ethic.

Friendly greetings,
		/gec




-- 
Instruments register only through things they're designed to register.
Space still contains infinite unknowns.

Germano Caronni    caronni@nessie.cs.id.ethz.ch