Article View: sci.crypt
Article #2866Re: Zimmermann's responses to Sidelnikov's
From: jac54
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 11:53
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 11:53
27 lines
1477 bytes
1477 bytes
In article <1993Jan22.154035.20835@shearson.com> dmandl@shearson.com writes: >In article 22207@colnet.cmhnet.org, res@colnet.cmhnet.org (Rob Stampfli) writes: > >>Actually, among the oddities I find delightful (and scary) about fortran >>is the fact that >> >> DO 10 I=1,5 >> >>and >> >> DO 10 I=1.5 >> >>are both valid, but do entirely different things. > >If I remember correctly, it was an error exactly like this that >blew up a U.S. rocket (complete with astronauts) back in the '70s. >One of the programmers used a comma instead of a period, or vice >versa, and no one caught it. The story was related in the C.P.S.R. >paper that argued against the "Star Wars" boondoggle. The paper >even included the original line of code. > I think you remember incorrectly. This was one of the early Polaris tests (late 50's-early 60's). How many stories of U.S. astronauts being lost in flight can you remember. I can remember one, and that had to do with faulty plumbing. Alec Chambers
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1993Jan25.115302.27951@cas.org>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!malgudi.oar.net!chemabs!jac54References:
<1993Jan21.143916.22207@colnet.cmhnet.org> <1993Jan22.154035.20835@shearson.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Newsgroups: sci.crypt Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!malgudi.oar.net!chemabs!jac54 From: jac54@cas.org () Subject: Re: Zimmermann's responses to Sidelnikov's Message-ID: <1993Jan25.115302.27951@cas.org> Sender: usenet@cas.org Organization: Chemical Abstracts Service, Columbus, Ohio References: <1993Jan21.143916.22207@colnet.cmhnet.org> <1993Jan22.154035.20835@shearson.com> Date: Mon, 25 Jan 1993 11:53:02 GMT Lines: 27