Article View: sci.crypt
Article #374Re: Registered Keys - why the need?
From: Bohdan Tashchuk
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 1992 05:43
Date: Wed, 04 Nov 1992 05:43
24 lines
1623 bytes
1623 bytes
In <1992Nov3.090942.1626@guvax.acc.georgetown.edu> denning@guvax.acc.georgetown.edu writes:
>I believe I said this before, but let me remind everyone that the
>government has not proposed that keys be registered. I believe that
>Ron Rivest was the first to make this suggestion. I made it at the
>NCSC and Silvio Micali has come up with a scheme that is even more
>foolproof. I do not know if any government agency will pick up
>on our suggestion or if they'll suggest another. Are there other
>approaches that would give you greater assurance against the
>government and still allow for meeting the legitimate needs of
>law enforcement? If so, I'd love to hear them.
You mention Gotti in your post, but you still haven't answered the fundamental
question I asked. I'll ask it again:
"If key registration were mandatory, would John Gotti register his keys?"
I say the answer is NO.
And I further say that having ANY sort of punishment for "using unregistered
keys" is a gross infringement of our constitutional rights.
Just because nobody has proposed "other approaches that would give greater
assurance ..." doesn't mean that your proposal is a good one.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1992Nov4.054330.17139@fasttech.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!verdix!islabs!fasttech!zekeReferences:
<1992Nov3.090942.1626@guvax.acc.georgetown.edu>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ogicse!verdix!islabs!fasttech!zeke From: zeke@fasttech.com (Bohdan Tashchuk) Newsgroups: sci.crypt,comp.org.eff.talk,alt.privacy Subject: Re: Registered Keys - why the need? Message-ID: <1992Nov4.054330.17139@fasttech.com> Date: 4 Nov 92 05:43:30 GMT Article-I.D.: fasttech.1992Nov4.054330.17139 References: <1992Nov3.090942.1626@guvax.acc.georgetown.edu> Organization: Fast Technology Lines: 24