Article View: sci.crypt
Article #892Re: Wordperfect file-locking (faq?)
From: Carl Ellison
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 1992 15:30
Date: Thu, 03 Sep 1992 15:30
18 lines
1199 bytes
1199 bytes
In article <adamsd.715442992@crash> adamsd@crash.cts.com (Adams Douglas) writes: >[...] Wordperfect 5.1 is easily broken. Yup. > Is this something that can be fixed or guarded against >(without actually doing something outside the program)? Nope -- not without massive re-code. >Why is it so easily crackable? Were they just lazy, or what? If not lazy, they were like other beginners in crypto. Everybody seems to go through the same learning curve. At each stage, you're convinced that your algorithm is so complex no one will be able to crack it. Once someone does, it's back to the drawing board. This is why it's strongly recommended that a person break several cryptosystems before attempting to design one of his/her own.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<6140@transfer.stratus.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ulowell!m2c!crackers!transfer!ellisun.sw.stratus.com!cmeReferences:
<adamsd.715442992@crash>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!sparky!uunet!ulowell!m2c!crackers!transfer!ellisun.sw.stratus.com!cme From: cme@ellisun.sw.stratus.com (Carl Ellison) Newsgroups: sci.crypt Subject: Re: Wordperfect file-locking (faq?) Keywords: WordPerfect, encryption Message-ID: <6140@transfer.stratus.com> Date: 3 Sep 92 15:30:51 GMT References: <adamsd.715442992@crash> Sender: usenet@transfer.stratus.com Organization: Stratus Computer, Software Engineering Lines: 18