🚀 go-pugleaf

On Thu, 9 Apr 2009 15:58:41 -0700 (PDT), Alf
<j7q5xz58cya@lightning.e4ward.com> wrote:

>
>
>On VDARE.com's Peter Brimelow and "Electing a New People"
>
>Edmund Connelly
>
>April 8, 2009
>
>John Derbyshire has rather pointedly described the fate of those who
>would criticize Jews in a remarkable exchange with Joey Kurtzman, a
>Jewish editor of the website Jewcy.com:
>
>  So far as the consequences of ticking off Jews are concerned: ...
>  I was making particular reference to respectable rightwing
>  journalism, most especially in the U.S. I can absolutely assure
>  you that anyone who made general, mildly negative, remarks about
>  Jews would NOT - not ever again - be published in the Wall Street
>  Journal opinion pages, The Weekly Standard, National Review, The
>  New York Sun, The New York Post, or The Washington Times. I know
>  the actual people, the editors, involved here, and I can assert
>  this confidently.
>
>I thought about this when reading Peter Brimelow's speech at Michael
>Hart's Preserving Western Civilization conference in early February.
>Brimelow runs the excellent racial realism site VDARE.com, an
>immigration reform site that champions the interests of the American
>majority - European-Americans.
>
>For this, Brimelow and his writers have drawn the wrath of the
>mainstream and liberal left, particularly the SPLC - routinely
>referred to as the $PLC at VDARE. [Editorial note: TOO announces that
>from now on it will shamelessly copy this wonderfully accurate
>designation.)
>
>He has also been shunned by mainstream conservative publications such
>as National Review where he was once Senior Editor. Jonah Goldberg,
>who personifies the changing of the guard at NR after Brimelow left,
>referred to Brimelow as "a once-respected conservative voice." As
>Brimelow notes, NR is "a once-conservative, now respected, magazine."
>I'm sure that the $PLC couldn't be happier that Jonah Goldberg and his
>ilk are ensconced at NR.
>
>Brimelow introduces the problem he sees the West facing, delivered in
>the form of an observation followed by a question:
>
>  This is a problem which we see throughout the Western world--an
>  unprecedentedly huge influx of non-traditional immigration. The
>  result of this is that every major Western nation will be a
>  minority in its homeland in the foreseeable future. It takes less
>  time in some places and more time in others, but the calculations
>  can easily be made. . . .
>
>What's so amazing about this transformation is that it has no economic
>benefit for the traditional people of the Western nations that are
>voluntarily giving up their identity - and their political power. As
>Brimelow phrases it, the question then becomes "Why are these
>countries doing this to themselves if they are not benefiting their
>native-born - their own people?"
>
>We at TOO have little doubt about the main force behind these
>transformations: The organized Jewish community.  These
>transformations have nothing to do with economics but everything to do
>with ethnic activism and identity politics.
>
>There are hints of this in Brimelow's talk, although it was probably
>impolitic for him to mention it given the strong participation of Jews
>at the conference. As noted by The Searchlight (an $PLC-like outfit in
>the UK that is now running a "Hope not hate" campaign against the
>BNP), the conference was "an attempt to create a new ideological pole
>friendlier to Jewish participation, but within the broader white
>nationalist movement. They would bind Islamophobia and nativism with
>scientific racism." Not quite the way I'd say it, but you get the
>idea.
>
>Brimelow points to the growing Jewish support for Democratic politics
>in America - despite their relative prosperity.  Jews are an economic
>elite but their voting patterns much more resemble non-white
>minorities - they "earn like Episcopalians and vote like Puerto
>Ricans," as Milton Himmelfarb phrased it.
>
>Indeed, Brimelow notes that higher percentages of Jews voted for Obama
>than the average for other minorities (83% to 79%). Why this is so "is
>a good question and in some ways the most important question in the
>immigration debate. And I recommend it to you for further discussion."
>
>Never one to pass up an invitation like that, I would point out that
>from the time they came to the US in large numbers, Jews have had a
>very negative view of traditional Americans and their culture. As
>Elliott Abrams put it, the mainstream Jewish community "clings to what
>is at bottom a dark vision of America, as a land permeated with anti-
>Semitism and always on the verge of anti-Semitic outbursts." As
>portrayed by the Jewish media, "Western civilization is ... a failing,
>dying culture, but at worst it is ... sick and evil compared to other
>cultures."  It's all about identity politics.
>
>Brimelow gets right down to brass tacks about one side of the
>equation-he discusses and defends the interests of whites.
>
>  Obama doesn't have 43% of his appointees white Protestants, in
>  fact I don't think even 4% are white Protestants. So you have to
>  ask yourself what's going on here. How can the founding stock of
>  the country have so completely lost control? They could
>  reasonably regard the Obama administration as kind of an
>  occupation government: a coalition of united minorities that
>  succeeded in uniting the minorities and dividing the majority.
>
>As fate would have it, this observation resonated with something I had
>just read about the way Bolsheviks had assumed power in 1917 at the
>beginning of the Soviet era. A shadowy Executive Committee ruled, and
>among those with power "more than half were Jewish socialists." Native
>Russians did not even make up a quarter. One participant noted that
>"the most striking thing about the composition of the EC was the
>number of foreign elements." The deaths of tens of millions of
>underrepresented white non-Jews followed. (The details of this
>genocide come from Nobel laureate Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn's two-volume
>study of Russian-Jewish relations, Two Hundred Years Together. Still
>lacking an English translation after seven years, Occidental Quarterly
>contributor F. Roger Devlin has worked from the French translation to
>provide a superb overview of Solzhenitsyn's work. See The Occidental
>Quarterly Fall 2008 and Winter 2008-2009. Order here.)
>
>Brimelow offered further room for discussion when last month he
>published Kevin MacDonald's VDARE.com piece Memories Of Madison-My
>Life In The New Left. There MacDonald reiterated his argument that
>radical Jews of the 1960s "had destructive fantasies in which the
>revolution would result in `humiliation, dispossession, imprisonment
>or execution of the oppressors.'"
>
>In particular, the dispossession component is being accomplished by
>support for massive non-traditional immigration. MacDonald argued that
>"Jewish activism on behalf of non-white immigration can be directly
>traced back to Jewish activists on the left." Indeed, "Massive non-
>white immigration into Western societies has been a project of the
>Jewish left for pretty much the entire last century.
>
>continued
>
>http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/authors/Connelly-Brimelow.html#pb

If an amnesty-granting bill came up for a vote not one single Jewish
Congressman or Senator would vote against it. Look their votes
on same issue 18 months ago.

ted