🚀 go-pugleaf

How come churches didnt forbid tress if they are so diverse...?
Probably they did. And the resultant was Agriculture. It would be the
will of a single person stating as dogma Reality as he could
assimilate it, then forcing it on those who didnt accept it and were
refuting it.  Agriculture would then be a refutation of the diversity
of vegetable life. It still is in essence but not intent(ion). So one
voice would say: this is ALL Reality as it is and there is nothing
more beyond this words; the other one would reply: no, trees are very
different, it doesnt include all (possible) trees. In equilibrium
Agriculture happened. The primitive dogma imposes itself and forces an
equality, a standarization of vegetable life to prove its point, those
not convinced by the dogma would eventually live in a completely
harvested reality, (possibly) slaved without any chance of knowing
wild environments, dogma in a church structure keeping the immediate
environment both **safe** and ordered according to the original,
limited dogma. This viewpoint is significative in the explanation and
as the explanation provided by the myth of Adam and the inclusion of a
tree as the source of both good and evil. To the intent of a primitive
agricultural church agriculture is both a victory and self defeat; any
dogma is eventually as self defeat as its imposition on a diverse
Reality is in itself an act of creativity that adds to a diverse,
adogmatic Reality; in mathematical terms it is the inclusion of an
(artificial) constraint in a system with an infinite number of degrees
of freedom. So once plant life was reduced to the limitation of dogma,
its new creation would give such freedom to the population that the
original dogma would be insufficient and eventually ignored, turned
into a technique and technology. This origin of agriculture may have
happened several times in different human populations **as a
necessity**...

I have to remind the guys who published a book on evolution that it IS
the main point of Alive and Human and it WAS the point being contended
that prompted me to publish here. It is the thesis that is important,
so I cant see how come it is the thesis of their book if the problem
has been to find an editorial project to develop the document.

Fabrizio J Bonsignore now Danilo J Bonsignore