🚀 go-pugleaf

NO entendiste que no podias confiar en nadie mas que en mi porque hubo
un ROBO? TU sabes lo que fue la intrusion de la Acer y como se la robo
el tipejo ese. Si la nigna del saco rojo era nuestra hija y le
hicieron cirugia, olvidala, no salio del bagno y ya venia ROTA. La
otra nigna que se parece ya me esquivo ayer. La otra que se parece a
ti lo mismo en la estacion. Y ninguno ha querido decirme quien es el
maldito jefe de estacion en tres agnos.

A PSYCHOPATH IN GOVERNMENT.

It is an INSULT that I am called to court as jury when NONE of my
cases has even been acknowledged as existent and lives were dependent
on it. I CANT DOWNLOAD MY RESUME THAT SITE WAS HACKED.

On Jan 25, 10:52 pm, Fabrizio J Bonsignore <djbonsign...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> How come churches didnt forbid tress if they are so diverse...?
> Probably they did. And the resultant was Agriculture. It would be the
> will of a single person stating as dogma Reality as he could
> assimilate it, then forcing it on those who didnt accept it and were
> refuting it.  Agriculture would then be a refutation of the diversity
> of vegetable life. It still is in essence but not intent(ion). So one
> voice would say: this is ALL Reality as it is and there is nothing
> more beyond this words; the other one would reply: no, trees are very
> different, it doesnt include all (possible) trees. In equilibrium
> Agriculture happened. The primitive dogma imposes itself and forces an
> equality, a standarization of vegetable life to prove its point, those
> not convinced by the dogma would eventually live in a completely
> harvested reality, (possibly) slaved without any chance of knowing
> wild environments, dogma in a church structure keeping the immediate
> environment both **safe** and ordered according to the original,
> limited dogma. This viewpoint is significative in the explanation and
> as the explanation provided by the myth of Adam and the inclusion of a
> tree as the source of both good and evil. To the intent of a primitive
> agricultural church agriculture is both a victory and self defeat; any
> dogma is eventually as self defeat as its imposition on a diverse
> Reality is in itself an act of creativity that adds to a diverse,
> adogmatic Reality; in mathematical terms it is the inclusion of an
> (artificial) constraint in a system with an infinite number of degrees
> of freedom. So once plant life was reduced to the limitation of dogma,
> its new creation would give such freedom to the population that the
> original dogma would be insufficient and eventually ignored, turned
> into a technique and technology. This origin of agriculture may have
> happened several times in different human populations **as a
> necessity**...
>
> I have to remind the guys who published a book on evolution that it IS
> the main point of Alive and Human and it WAS the point being contended
> that prompted me to publish here. It is the thesis that is important,
> so I cant see how come it is the thesis of their book if the problem
> has been to find an editorial project to develop the document.
>
> FabrizioJBonsignorenow DaniloJBonsignore

The Sterens algorithm ensures there will be homonyms the bigger the
coupling set is. It would be the only link to the father, to use the
same name for the boy; also for the mother it would help the father
locate them later. This idea can be formalized in terms of information
to distinguish a Sterens setup from consecutive marriages from
polygamy as such...

I know the names of three or four of the children then.

Fabrizio J Bonsignore now Danilo J Bonsignore