🚀 go-pugleaf

On Sep 4, 12:03 am, Fabrizio J Bonsignore <djbonsign...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> The New Testament story can be interpreted also steganographically.
Following consistently the argument other inversions also make sense.
Jesus (Judas, fancy name), was born in Rome or some nearby province,
then sent to Judea and not viceversa. Jesus s brain was a normal
brain, hence mind signals would bounce on it giving the impression of
being a telepath and a speaking baby or newborn god (same as with
Budha). Considering a high birth, among wealthy citizens (small
rulers), that brain would generate sufficient interest to get several
minds concentrating on it (more likely the mother) giving it an early
advantage from the outset to learn language. This emigration is also
supported by the Sterens algorithm. The apparently speaking baby would
be sent abroad and separated from the father... hence the **virgin**
mother would be an altogether different half sister. It can be assumed
a cline going from Herod s (half sister) wife down to Mary Magdalene,
so the **virgin** mother would turn to be, either a young virgin meant
as payment for the effort, or, following variations in the
schizophrenics patterns, a young transexual acting as surrogate mother
(death at birth was common then). This last interpretation is
supported as the real mother would be kept near the ruling family as
one member of the (provincial) court and cline, in touch at a distance
with her half sister (or half brother)...

Distance would make **evident** the telepathic nature of the baby and
would attract interested people. Steganography here is key as the
birth and place of residence would be confused, Bethlehem becoming
Nazareth and viceversa. Note that for some **initiates** the inversion
formula would be know, attracting poeple to each one and all of the
places mentioned in the time, desert people, attracted by the notion
of an ambulant god or future ruler. Later, that Jesus would be mocked
as being the king of jews as then Herodes would know he is not the
king, the real king (after a half coup d etat) existing somewhere in a
different role.

> All three major religious ideologies arrive at and include cannibalism
> through indirect means. Judaism reaches it through its food and

Compared this integrated ideologies to the Chronos myth and the Greek
mythology in general. In the traditional religious scheme the whole
society is subordinated to the common alter father in whose name
things happened and are ordered. In the Greek society all of them gods
are monsters, both extraordinary in their acts BUT at the same time
common and human, archetypical patterns. They are the extremes godly
ordinary humans dont want to reproduce. They also set themes for
normal interactions, society s roles to be imitated. Religions instead
tell followers what to do and how to behave. For one mass events
become artistic, discussions or common sexuality; for the other they
become praying, abstinence and occult practices meant for the
initiates in a rigid structure.

Fabrizio J Bonsignore now Danilo J Bonsignore