🚀 go-pugleaf

This is the first step of the Sterens algorythm:

1. Place a man
2. place a woman to get pregnant
3. separate man, woman and baby
4. repeat from 2. at will with a similarly looking woman

There can be several sets of assumptions as to information and
realionships of the parties involved, to give raise to a family of
algorythms and implementations for different purposes. Considering
otehr parties involved (managers, outer children) and different forms
to separate and reunite the people involved, a whole family of
algorythms can gro from this simple exposition...

On Jul 31, 3:40 pm, Fabrizio J Bonsignore <djbonsign...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> On Jul 25, 3:02 pm,FabrizioJBonsignore<djbonsign...@hotmail.com>
> wrote:
> > wrote:> The fixed relationships constraint can be defeated by using the
> > > Sterens algorithm, as long as enforcers cant discern the difference
> > > between the people concerned. This way a single male can enjoy several
.
> > (snip)
> > [this means Catholic type marriages]
.
> > > pressure of the enforcers s psychosis. For one, the woman is
> > > **rationally** murdered to avoid being __discovered__ (deep meaning
> > > here), while for the other the woman is **rationally** murdered as she
> > > broke the law OR she MAY break the fixed relationships law... (much
> > > more to follow here in this subtheme).
.
> [The Sterens algorythm] affects economic reality when taking into
> account that fortune heirs are not the real biological heirs but
> belong to just any family... ...then if descendants are recognized
> fortunes are split in ways unintended by the wealthy father. Part of
> thise fortune, if not all of it, ends up in the hands of the managers
> of the families. Several, several crisis and pressures can be expected
> from the existence of unrecognized heirs and around their
> recognition...
.
> The Greek chorus in ancient greek mythology has its origin in the
> phenomenon of bounding signals. As telepathy works through pattern
> matching, the transmitting person will bounce its signal on those
> (insulated) brains matching _partially_ the transmitters current
> throughts. By observers it will sound as if there are SEVERAL
> synchronized minds expresing the same thought, drones as it seems.
> This may happen independently of the transmitter, as the transmitter
> itself may be the target of a bounced signal, this becoming even truer
> if that target is also a carrier field. So, for instance we have:
.
> T ---m--\  CF ---mp----\ [N1,N2,N3,...] /----- S
.
> where T is the source telepath, m is the message, CF is the carrier
> field telepath targeted by m, p is the (people addressing) pattern
> being matched implicitly, N1... are normal people whose brains match
> the key p and S is the schizo observer. S will have the impresson that
> n people are delivering (maybe to him personally) the message m, but
> in fact it is T who is manipulating S through CF (considering that N
> may be totally unaware of the phenomenon, its only function being that
> of matching and rejecting the transmission mp). As message me will
> include enough information to at least trigger the synthesis of a
> voice, the pattern matched by N will include _some_ voice pitch being
> oberved by S. This would distinguish between bounced signals (on N)
> from repeated signals by some N being actually T themselves...

Fabrizio J Bonsignore now Danilo J Bonsignore