🚀 go-pugleaf

RetroBBS NetNews Server

Inspired by RockSolid Light RIP Retro Guy

Article View: sci.econ
Article #2514

Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields

#2514
From: Michael Scheltgen
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:54
104 lines
8706 bytes
Why don't you just start a blog at yahoo 360 or myspace and stop spamming usenet.


djbonsignore@gmail.com wrote:
> I would have to say that they are all free and well and have
> instructions to come see me to NYC ASAP to have a lengthy discussion
> in some coffee shop, the one that resembles the one we used to go
> almost every day for years, but I am losing real hope. Somebody else
> has been doing that and giving real instructions. I understand why
> sometimes she didnt have the keys to the house and why sometimes she
> didnt want me to take her home in the night. We were administered, the
> fact is that we never concurred even if we met in the same places. I
> wouldnt miss an appointment, we would agree next appointment the
> previous day, only sometimes arriving late things would go bad. I
> wouldnt speak if she was late, feeling very angry! But no wonder I
> wouldnt be rejected, I would feel hurt right away and it would show
> that I was in love. I never asked when she would tell me her sister
> was in the other room, I would simply accept it... small discrepancies
> that now make more sense, but I am still burning in the need of ask
> and be answered. They were not impersonating, we were following
> NATURAL sympathies! The fact is that we were in public and they were
> free to go and leave me there but it didnt happen... or maybe once?
> There was enough space for interrelationship struggles and fights, but
> then my whole strategy of knowing and making myself known lost
> meaning! I dont even know how many times it happened, which is why I
> need to _speak_ with them and expect them to have NORMAL changes, that
> is, changes that intuition and instinct identify with the normal
> passage of time. We all need to know how many children. It is a real
> pity that perturbed religious men have to go in between and insist in
> treating us like animals with fixed heat periods, fixed stereotyped
> behaviours, fixed number of relationships, fixed... as if we were
> FIXED by instinct and nature and environment when in fact we are FREE
> because of language we can use to escape FIXED programs, PREwritten
> programs...
> 
> Damned, it is like being turned into unconnected pieces, lost bits of
> past. I didnt mention the names of people who really knew my first
> name. I dont even know who turned our relationship into a nightmare,
> who ended the relationship, who read what, who knew what, some
> important informations would be missing and they would understand
> nothing! I understood nothing. I mean, there was my girlfriend and
> that s all I needed to know. No wonder we didnt have sex every night
> or every day, it would be like going to bed the first date! So... how
> come I am not getting the just rewards for all these efforts?
> 
> This is the meaning of Lot in the Bible, turning back, the woman turns
> into a salt statue, not a NECESSITY, no LOGICAL NECESSITY, not even a
> SOCIAL NECESSITY, but people do look alike. Turning back the woman s
> condition has changed, we are supposed as men to go to another woman!
> Then people, _some_ people will take this as an axiom and make it
> happen. The woman is salty because some people wont want, based on
> that old story, to have the same man go back. Something happened to
> her. Marriage is only a partial solution as there is no guarantee that
> she wont change or be exchanged with somebody else. The other solution
> is downright kidnapping the woman and then let the other one appear,
> another one who is similarly looking. From here the Goppis are a
> natural outcome and the man ends up with a whole group. As the woman
> changes, the Sterens algorithm has two times, in one the woman
> dissapears and takes away the child, in the next movement the child is
> taken away from the mother and given to somebody else. The father,
> oblivious, finds later the child and may commit incest. Hence rules
> imposed regarding parenthood to avoid the real next-generation-child
> to go back to the father (or be given the mother when forced to
> change, there is some leeway in this respect). Fixed rules so that the
> situation doesnt arise, except for those who do kidnap and dont let
> the children go astray or be taken by the midwife, now hospital nurses
> confusing them. Children are already a different genetic strain, so
> **incest** can be assumed without **big** consequences, just in case,
> because the children wre taken away and rules like the 4-n rule are
> applied. Marriage, beyond human needs of affection and familiarity, is
> a threat, either you marry and stay or the woman is turned into salt
> and dissolves. No way to look back, it is a mistake, but a social
> mistake, cultural, not an affective, emotional mistake when it becomes
> necessary.
> 
> In terms of man evolving we are still Man escaping the predator. In a
> state of nature Man cant have sex at will, it has to be at some
> minimum cared for, agreed, taken care, because it is a moment of
> vulnerability, between feeding, watery environments to safer
> vegetation surroundings, the group had to have some order to avoid
> losing members. Having sex turns into a danger! Here lies the
> association between sex and death, having sex is being at the mercy of
> the predator, so people dont want to have sex because they are scared
> of death. These feelings, base, unconscious, hardwired fears can of
> course be transmitted through biological radio to create difficult to
> understand behaviours.
> 
> There is a bad Bush around, right? Maybe some facial surgeried Lu is
> and that is why there is so much trouble? I dont want to think they
> were being taken to jail and then somebody was paying the bail, so I
> wouldnt meet them, they were being kidnapped.
> 
> Somebody is WATCHING recording studios? They are soundproofed. Bullets
> can be shot and nobody would know in the outside; in fact, only
> through telepathy those murders would be if not known at least
> suspected, even if the notion is quite obvious when you are forced to
> think in terms of casualties.
> 
> FISH. It is a solution to telepathy, THC being maybe an
> antitelepathic. I ate fish for almost 18 years nonstop and didnt have
> such problems as schizophrenia or proofs of telepathy.
> 
> Fabrizio J Bonsignore now Danilo J Bonsignore
> 
Technical Details
Message-ID: <jbOWh.115563$aG1.37696@pd7urf3no>
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!out02b.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!in02.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf3no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
References: <eb683cee3b6eda777e57e792be26e0ee@localhost.talkaboutinvestments.com> <1174519688.343932.292110@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <c13a1e470ed2e23b68e129b502976add@localhost.talkaboutinvestments.com> <67352cc67ff2c5ee6e1db9faa1e3784a@localhost.talkaboutinvestments.com> <15f0d2c5df009da344d08d556ada5598@localhost.talkaboutinvestments.com> <db97b6f3bc86b27f806a00282a1dfe64@localhost.talkaboutinvestments.com> <da37d13ab45d2346d776f020c3521c94@localhost.talkaboutinvestments.com> <4b1b857e264a7f5b4bda37b7c13a5875@localhost.talkaboutinvestments.com> <9b52221e26fdd02a72d6d7573368fa4c@localhost.talkaboutinvestments.com> <ba99a71b5297ebf8146ff80f054a9afc@localhost.talkaboutinvestments.com> <d15023faf14ea89d5cf526339f55ff50@localhost.talkaboutinvestments.com> <13d8ae68caa722b5119ff491c6bc474d@localhost.talkaboutinvestments.com> <1176379635.220736.46580@y5g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>

Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: fd5f7,8b5f9c7cb4a799fd
X-Google-Thread: 10b271,8b5f9c7cb4a799fd
X-Google-Thread: 10a12a,bf75ff51f7916032
X-Google-Thread: 101049,bf75ff51f7916032
X-Google-Thread: fb1cb,e6677ea6d318a640
X-Google-Attributes: gidfd5f7,gid10b271,gid10a12a,gid101049,gidfb1cb,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!out02b.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!in02.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf3no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail
X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 24.82.170.89
From: Michael Scheltgen <mjs818@econ.usask.ca>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Newsgroups: sci.econ,sci.physics,ny.general,dc.general,seattle.general
Subject: Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields
References: <eb683cee3b6eda777e57e792be26e0ee@localhost.talkaboutinvestments.com>   <1174519688.343932.292110@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com>   <c13a1e470ed2e23b68e129b502976add@localhost.talkaboutinvestments.com>   <67352cc67ff2c5ee6e1db9faa1e3784a@localhost.talkaboutinvestments.com>   <15f0d2c5df009da344d08d556ada5598@localhost.talkaboutinvestments.com>   <db97b6f3bc86b27f806a00282a1dfe64@localhost.talkaboutinvestments.com>   <da37d13ab45d2346d776f020c3521c94@localhost.talkaboutinvestments.com>   <4b1b857e264a7f5b4bda37b7c13a5875@localhost.talkaboutinvestments.com>   <9b52221e26fdd02a72d6d7573368fa4c@localhost.talkaboutinvestments.com>   <ba99a71b5297ebf8146ff80f054a9afc@localhost.talkaboutinvestments.com>   <d15023faf14ea89d5cf526339f55ff50@localhost.talkaboutinvestments.com>   <13d8ae68caa722b5119ff491c6bc474d@localhost.talkaboutinvestments.com> <1176379635.220736.46580@y5g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>
In-Reply-To: <1176379635.220736.46580@y5g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 000735-1, 21/04/2007), Outbound message
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Lines: 104
Message-ID: <jbOWh.115563$aG1.37696@pd7urf3no>
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:54:07 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.144.74
X-Complaints-To: abuse@shaw.ca
X-Trace: pd7urf3no 1177268047 64.59.144.74 (Sun, 22 Apr 2007 12:54:07 MDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 12:54:07 MDT
Organization: Shaw Residential Internet