Article View: sci.econ
Article #2514Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields
From: Michael Scheltgen
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:54
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:54
104 lines
8706 bytes
8706 bytes
Why don't you just start a blog at yahoo 360 or myspace and stop spamming usenet. djbonsignore@gmail.com wrote: > I would have to say that they are all free and well and have > instructions to come see me to NYC ASAP to have a lengthy discussion > in some coffee shop, the one that resembles the one we used to go > almost every day for years, but I am losing real hope. Somebody else > has been doing that and giving real instructions. I understand why > sometimes she didnt have the keys to the house and why sometimes she > didnt want me to take her home in the night. We were administered, the > fact is that we never concurred even if we met in the same places. I > wouldnt miss an appointment, we would agree next appointment the > previous day, only sometimes arriving late things would go bad. I > wouldnt speak if she was late, feeling very angry! But no wonder I > wouldnt be rejected, I would feel hurt right away and it would show > that I was in love. I never asked when she would tell me her sister > was in the other room, I would simply accept it... small discrepancies > that now make more sense, but I am still burning in the need of ask > and be answered. They were not impersonating, we were following > NATURAL sympathies! The fact is that we were in public and they were > free to go and leave me there but it didnt happen... or maybe once? > There was enough space for interrelationship struggles and fights, but > then my whole strategy of knowing and making myself known lost > meaning! I dont even know how many times it happened, which is why I > need to _speak_ with them and expect them to have NORMAL changes, that > is, changes that intuition and instinct identify with the normal > passage of time. We all need to know how many children. It is a real > pity that perturbed religious men have to go in between and insist in > treating us like animals with fixed heat periods, fixed stereotyped > behaviours, fixed number of relationships, fixed... as if we were > FIXED by instinct and nature and environment when in fact we are FREE > because of language we can use to escape FIXED programs, PREwritten > programs... > > Damned, it is like being turned into unconnected pieces, lost bits of > past. I didnt mention the names of people who really knew my first > name. I dont even know who turned our relationship into a nightmare, > who ended the relationship, who read what, who knew what, some > important informations would be missing and they would understand > nothing! I understood nothing. I mean, there was my girlfriend and > that s all I needed to know. No wonder we didnt have sex every night > or every day, it would be like going to bed the first date! So... how > come I am not getting the just rewards for all these efforts? > > This is the meaning of Lot in the Bible, turning back, the woman turns > into a salt statue, not a NECESSITY, no LOGICAL NECESSITY, not even a > SOCIAL NECESSITY, but people do look alike. Turning back the woman s > condition has changed, we are supposed as men to go to another woman! > Then people, _some_ people will take this as an axiom and make it > happen. The woman is salty because some people wont want, based on > that old story, to have the same man go back. Something happened to > her. Marriage is only a partial solution as there is no guarantee that > she wont change or be exchanged with somebody else. The other solution > is downright kidnapping the woman and then let the other one appear, > another one who is similarly looking. From here the Goppis are a > natural outcome and the man ends up with a whole group. As the woman > changes, the Sterens algorithm has two times, in one the woman > dissapears and takes away the child, in the next movement the child is > taken away from the mother and given to somebody else. The father, > oblivious, finds later the child and may commit incest. Hence rules > imposed regarding parenthood to avoid the real next-generation-child > to go back to the father (or be given the mother when forced to > change, there is some leeway in this respect). Fixed rules so that the > situation doesnt arise, except for those who do kidnap and dont let > the children go astray or be taken by the midwife, now hospital nurses > confusing them. Children are already a different genetic strain, so > **incest** can be assumed without **big** consequences, just in case, > because the children wre taken away and rules like the 4-n rule are > applied. Marriage, beyond human needs of affection and familiarity, is > a threat, either you marry and stay or the woman is turned into salt > and dissolves. No way to look back, it is a mistake, but a social > mistake, cultural, not an affective, emotional mistake when it becomes > necessary. > > In terms of man evolving we are still Man escaping the predator. In a > state of nature Man cant have sex at will, it has to be at some > minimum cared for, agreed, taken care, because it is a moment of > vulnerability, between feeding, watery environments to safer > vegetation surroundings, the group had to have some order to avoid > losing members. Having sex turns into a danger! Here lies the > association between sex and death, having sex is being at the mercy of > the predator, so people dont want to have sex because they are scared > of death. These feelings, base, unconscious, hardwired fears can of > course be transmitted through biological radio to create difficult to > understand behaviours. > > There is a bad Bush around, right? Maybe some facial surgeried Lu is > and that is why there is so much trouble? I dont want to think they > were being taken to jail and then somebody was paying the bail, so I > wouldnt meet them, they were being kidnapped. > > Somebody is WATCHING recording studios? They are soundproofed. Bullets > can be shot and nobody would know in the outside; in fact, only > through telepathy those murders would be if not known at least > suspected, even if the notion is quite obvious when you are forced to > think in terms of casualties. > > FISH. It is a solution to telepathy, THC being maybe an > antitelepathic. I ate fish for almost 18 years nonstop and didnt have > such problems as schizophrenia or proofs of telepathy. > > Fabrizio J Bonsignore now Danilo J Bonsignore >
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<jbOWh.115563$aG1.37696@pd7urf3no>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!out02b.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!in02.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf3no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mailReferences:
<eb683cee3b6eda777e57e792be26e0ee@localhost.talkaboutinvestments.com> <1174519688.343932.292110@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <c13a1e470ed2e23b68e129b502976add@localhost.talkaboutinvestments.com> <67352cc67ff2c5ee6e1db9faa1e3784a@localhost.talkaboutinvestments.com> <15f0d2c5df009da344d08d556ada5598@localhost.talkaboutinvestments.com> <db97b6f3bc86b27f806a00282a1dfe64@localhost.talkaboutinvestments.com> <da37d13ab45d2346d776f020c3521c94@localhost.talkaboutinvestments.com> <4b1b857e264a7f5b4bda37b7c13a5875@localhost.talkaboutinvestments.com> <9b52221e26fdd02a72d6d7573368fa4c@localhost.talkaboutinvestments.com> <ba99a71b5297ebf8146ff80f054a9afc@localhost.talkaboutinvestments.com> <d15023faf14ea89d5cf526339f55ff50@localhost.talkaboutinvestments.com> <13d8ae68caa722b5119ff491c6bc474d@localhost.talkaboutinvestments.com> <1176379635.220736.46580@y5g2000hsa.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: fd5f7,8b5f9c7cb4a799fd X-Google-Thread: 10b271,8b5f9c7cb4a799fd X-Google-Thread: 10a12a,bf75ff51f7916032 X-Google-Thread: 101049,bf75ff51f7916032 X-Google-Thread: fb1cb,e6677ea6d318a640 X-Google-Attributes: gidfd5f7,gid10b271,gid10a12a,gid101049,gidfb1cb,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!out02b.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!in02.usenetserver.com!news.usenetserver.com!pd7cy1no!pd7cy2no!shaw.ca!pd7urf3no.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail X-Trace-PostClient-IP: 24.82.170.89 From: Michael Scheltgen <mjs818@econ.usask.ca> User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.10 (Windows/20070221) MIME-Version: 1.0 Newsgroups: sci.econ,sci.physics,ny.general,dc.general,seattle.general Subject: Re: Theory of beliefs, belief fields References: <eb683cee3b6eda777e57e792be26e0ee@localhost.talkaboutinvestments.com> <1174519688.343932.292110@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com> <c13a1e470ed2e23b68e129b502976add@localhost.talkaboutinvestments.com> <67352cc67ff2c5ee6e1db9faa1e3784a@localhost.talkaboutinvestments.com> <15f0d2c5df009da344d08d556ada5598@localhost.talkaboutinvestments.com> <db97b6f3bc86b27f806a00282a1dfe64@localhost.talkaboutinvestments.com> <da37d13ab45d2346d776f020c3521c94@localhost.talkaboutinvestments.com> <4b1b857e264a7f5b4bda37b7c13a5875@localhost.talkaboutinvestments.com> <9b52221e26fdd02a72d6d7573368fa4c@localhost.talkaboutinvestments.com> <ba99a71b5297ebf8146ff80f054a9afc@localhost.talkaboutinvestments.com> <d15023faf14ea89d5cf526339f55ff50@localhost.talkaboutinvestments.com> <13d8ae68caa722b5119ff491c6bc474d@localhost.talkaboutinvestments.com> <1176379635.220736.46580@y5g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> In-Reply-To: <1176379635.220736.46580@y5g2000hsa.googlegroups.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Antivirus: avast! (VPS 000735-1, 21/04/2007), Outbound message X-Antivirus-Status: Clean Lines: 104 Message-ID: <jbOWh.115563$aG1.37696@pd7urf3no> Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 18:54:07 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.59.144.74 X-Complaints-To: abuse@shaw.ca X-Trace: pd7urf3no 1177268047 64.59.144.74 (Sun, 22 Apr 2007 12:54:07 MDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2007 12:54:07 MDT Organization: Shaw Residential Internet