🚀 go-pugleaf

[copied from the other server]
So finally the man showed up, with a permanent wince of pain I come to
associate to children murderers, the man I called the father of Lu is
BI strain, his natural father, in the Mid Manhattan library, wearing a
gray tweed jacket and black pants like the woman I found in that
school and I need to speak with. He is also wearing a green cap and
black leather gloves, with a book... on philosophy... He appears in
that set of photographs with a chair, where the bald, mutilated (no
arms, no legs) medium range photograph of a woman I knew was also
stored, along with the oter 24 cases of people I grew up with OR the
similar people that mafia managed to find. I knew him by the name of
Rincon. I recognize him because of the relation between height and the
height of the chair, he is 5-5 or 5-4, very broad shoulders and no
neck, so even despite the hood the figure is recognizable, also by the
context of the pictures that have meaning to me. No need to face
recognition though I do remember his face from the two times I saw him
when I was seven and nine years old. SHE has a long,
stylized neck, like mine. I think that man used other names to
approach my grandfather too independently of my aunt and my mother. I
am sure he is the natural father of that series of Lu is s, some of
them now unnaturally
older. I cant accept the theory that he was deincriminating himself by
incriminating himself to the eyes of some mafia, thinking if it he
must
have SUBMITTED those photographs to that site through a catch all
account,
unless it was his own site. I fear he may be ALSO using my name and it
was
he who convinced the police to steal my hard drive after a false,
uncivil
arrest in the UN through one of his acquaintances, then with facial
surgery. I also fear he will have a facial surgery soon to escape this
accusations. How come there is no real agent taking care of this case
when
I have been these last three years TRYING to contact somebody,
including
the attorneys? I just complained again. Dressing the same way she was
dressed is OBVIOUSLY a message that he is with her or he knows where
he is
or he is in touch with the people who know where she is. She and the
rest
who look like her or teh other people who appeared this last three
years
in NYC. He participated in the mutilation and torture of several
people
and is in league or contact with other **associates** of the same
cult.
WIll have to research it, he may pretend to be Muslim, Jehova Witness
or
Mormon, and uses those ideologies to justify his torturing activities.
What I still dont know is who is playing fool in the United States
government by condoning the whole situation, most likely somebody he
can
imply. Already sent this points to police authorities... Again, it is
the
way that mafia works that the victim is left in this lamentable state
of
affairs that even making phone calls and taking the subway are a
problem,
obviously to discredit from the beginning... But this is a democracy,
right? It is people who count, not property...

...Note how the hidden argument is used as a form of anticipation to
justify the whole scheme. Anticipation is a very schizophrenic
phenomenon,
as the schizo assumes he is overhearing the voices contents and then
acts
according to what has not yet happened, _because it is still an
intention
and not an act_. The basic assumption is that it is information from
the
source, so it happens before or during the act, therefore acting as a
prophecy. SO it becomes clever, rational, to anticipate acts according
to
taht information, therefore extending that behaviour to other aspects
of
everyday activity after some (small) success **proves** the decision
correct. By assuming the hidden argument that a man will have sex with
_ANY_ available couple, the rule can be totally enforced by
anticipation
of the act. It matters little that telepathy is directed, that is,
there
is a **thinking at** component that will act as hook for the schizo
mind
to tune and then interpret the message. People for whom incest is
natural
will not act with guilt! Their _think_at_ remains within the family
and
will hardly be perceived by sensitive minds. There is an incentive to
turn
incest into a crime to generate guilt even if enforcingthat law is
very
difficult, but then **culprits** _think_at_ enforcers while the act
happens, giving them the message to act. This is the reason of the
Freudian tabboo that incidentally was totally refuted, as far as
common
culture, in the old Egyptian Theocracies. Most situations will escape
the
enforcers, therefore to have the rule respected on a wide basis
(schizophrenic contradiction: cant know particular cases, but it must
be
made true for everybody), it has to be assumed that it always happens.
Eventually, by applying the rule as soon as an unlawful situation
becomes
evident, a whole society will assume a very characteristic family
structure, families composed only of women, families composed only of
men
(the three brother stories and myths), incest promoting families of
single
parent/child, many, if not most, composed by non relatives by the
technique of the changed baby. So as an offshoot to crime promoting, a
high incidence of emotional problems, socially wide aggression and
dysfunctional families will be prevalent, considering, of course, the
multiple pressures to ensure the **correct** application of the rule
within the context of a pleasure (sex) seeking, unavoidably rational
society...

Note _also_ how the hidden argument and rule apply independently of
the will of people. It is assumed by enforcers as a matter of fact
axiom that incest occurs and that men will look for sexual
opportunities, so the axiom works independently of any knowledge of
what truly occurs within a specific family. The rule then prevails by
simple outside observation, for those enforcers who cannot claim
priviledged (schizophrenic) sources of information. It is important to
understand that it is an invariant applied over a fundamentally
stochastic (random) system that will provoke a particular ordering and
distribution of family structures different from the **natural** order
family structure distribution. Unless we consider empiric methods to
force the sex of babies, there is no way  a particularly required baby
sex needed to maintain **order** can be consistently forecasted or
obtained, opening the ground for the several techniques to maintain
the rule for all people implied. It is very likely that in recorded
history no naturally occurring distribution has happened! So to
understand how the rule is applied the correct image is that of
multiple families and multiple groups of enforcers acting
simultaneously within their locality to finally establish an overall,
noticeable order, by using different **techniques** to maintain the
invariant of _at_most_ n marriages, or long term relationships, sex
being considered, also as a hidden argument, the motive and **glue**
for **marriages**.  There is an implicit permission to use the most
basic contraceptive techniques, also against the will of the
individual, which in an empiric society amounts to _PURPOSEFULLY_
spread diseases in the population, directly, to subvert medic
services, indirectly, and in more technologically advanced societies
to sterilize people, though sterilization can also happen by
triggering and forcing homosexuality, including the extreme of sex
change by turning males into females, an alternative to easier forms
of bioterrorism. The other alternative is of course murder and
kidnapping to separate women from men and to keep constant the maximum
number of marriages.

Here is where the murder and genocide of women is **justified**, more,
absolutely necessary to keep the rule enforced. Given that all forms
of mammal pregnancy hold some risk for both  the females as bearer of
new generationS and the baby, a successful mammal population will
evolve _at_least_ a slightly higher ratio of females against male, so
that once risk is discounted there are enough (sexual) couples to
guarantee a new generation, a new generation that under a natural
environment will be (stochastically) reduced in numbers by predators
and the aggression of the abiotic environment. In human terms then
there would be a natural excess of women for men to have more than one
couple [note that the whole argument is seen from the side of men,
which can be justified by accepting that male-female is a
complementary situation that lets one side determine the other side
automatically], but then the hidden argument of probable incest
determines that these excess relations be anticipated and stopped
before the rule is broken. More than one possibility opens itself,
exactly what course of action the enforcers will take depends on more
than on variable, but if an excess of women is perceived by more than
one group then shedding off that excess becomes the **natural**
**solution** and it will happen simultaneously in more than one
locality! Schizophrenic telepathy can indeed trigger the phenomenon
simultameously and en masse, independently of the overall situation,
which would of course lead to peculiar forms of genocide. So again by
forcing the invariant of a maximum constant number of marriages or
relationships for all men, the unintended but understandable result is
genocide...

Fabrizio J Bonsignore now Danilo J Bonsignore