🚀 go-pugleaf

Molinita, I remembered I (over)heard that nickname sometime, very
likely in some coffee shop or maybe walking in the street, as a name
to be despised, associated to hovels or a network, many years ago.
What else can I say?

It is paradoxic that people aware of the (maximum) rule would not
recognize their offspring as it would tell the enforcers they broke
the rule and are subject to their punishments, all of them designed to
enforce the rule, that is, to keep the number of sexual couples up to
an arbitrary, maximum number of sexual partners.

If the (usual) schizophrenic practice of turning males into females,
be it because they grew breasts after taking antipsychotics or
bioterrorist substances, or because fatness, or out of convincing or
by force or for whatever other **reason** was used to rationalize a
biologically aberrant behaviour (aberrant for mammals, though not for
some insects and even fish); if that practice is not taken into
account in census figures, abnormal male to female ratios would be
considered normal, with a very characteristic profile as the ratio
would imply more females than males at old ages (once enforcers decide
that sexuality is over, so individuals are already safe on the side of
breaking the rule, be it for lack of sexual drive or for lack of
beauty or for being alone), more males than females
at middle ages, but a normal ratio of more females than males in first
ages. Overall ratios would look normal if women are considered to live
longer than men. In other words, if travestism is not taken into
account, census data is perturbed. Given pregnancies risk, more males
than females should be observable at older ages, reflecting mortality
during birth. Census figures can be indicative of the application of
the maximum relation(ship)s rule, while its introduction would be
noticeable on a historical basis.

Male homosexuality can be explained as a low level transmission of
sexual desire from women affecting sensitive males. Some level of
verbal convincing may force  a man to go against his natural sexual
orientation on a rational basis, but a native (constant) communication
of desire for men, by women, would actually trigger arousment and
desire in schizo(phrenic) men. Expressing that desire in actual
homosexual relations would be a form of uncontrolled or evident
schizophrenia.

Fabrizio J Bonsigore now Danilo J Bonsignore