🚀 go-pugleaf

[conact of posts from the other server. Corkscrew (incisive story) is
there but not showing in the index]
The hidden argument of incest is also a self sustaining argument. Once
the locality applies its procedures and conforming families begin
existing, they can infer the conditions for incest exist and that
those conditions are widespread. This will be more true under their
view the more time passes. So in a way by making conformant families,
that is, by administering the offspring of a population according to
the constant rule, the hidden axiom can be considered true, further
justifying the enforcement of the rule by further administering family
composition... til it becomes a standard practice not even questioned
nor fully visible. Once the maximum number of marriages rule is
assumed to be fully implemented it can be easily assumed too that
family relations may or are indeed _false_, so claiming that some
particular member is a relative therefore it should
not be considered a marriage (romantic) sexual relation, so the rule
is being satisfied, will not be taken seriously by the enforcers; it
wont be believed! Any man can always say that a particular woman is a
relative when in fact she is not, so he is trying to brake the rule...
Note that it doesnt matter either whether man and woman look alike or
are very different, in both cases a credible case (even for third
parties) can be made that the life in common relation is also
sexual...

Yeah, with my code libraries a flash component is not that difficult
to
implement...

It is paradoxic that people aware of the (maximum marriages) rule
would not recognize their offspring as it would tell the enforcers
they broke the rule and are subject to their punishments, all of them
designed to enforce the rule, that is, to keep the number of sexual
couples up to an arbitrary, maximum number of sexual partners.

If the (usual) schizophrenic practice of turning males into females,
be it because they grew breasts after taking antipsychotics or
bioterrorist substances, or because fatness, or out of convincing or
by force or for whatever other **reason** was used to rationalize a
biologically aberrant behaviour (aberrant for mammals, though not for
some insects and even fish); if that practice is not taken into
account in census figures, abnormal male to female ratios would be
considered normal, with a very characteristic profile as the ratio
would imply more females than males at old ages (once enforcers decide
that sexuality is over, so individuals are already safe on the side of
breaking the rule, be it for lack of sexual drive or for lack of
beauty or for being alone), more males than females
at middle ages, but a normal ratio of more females than males in first
ages. Overall ratios would look normal if women are considered to live
longer than men. In other words, if travestism is not taken into
account, census data is perturbed. Given pregnancies risk, more males
than females should be observable at older ages, reflecting mortality
during birth. Census figures can be indicative of the application of
the maximum relation(ship)s rule, while its introduction would be
noticeable on a historical basis.

Individual preferences are irrelevant with respect to the rule. What
matters is that the enforcers cant know. Their role is just to enforce
the rule, other considerations become unsubstantial. Obviously for
them to be sure it would be needed an absolute public life for all
sexual couples, with total sex seggregation in other circumstances but
during intercourse, which amounts to life in a concentration camp.
Otherwise families would be able to engage in unlawful behaviours,
rendering the rule useless and the enforcers ineffective too. It would
refute the rule. Concentration camp like life, slavery, would be the
natural outcome of the rule, unless other techniques are used to
manage marriage, sexual life, all of them amounting to some crime.

So, say, if with a life expectancy of 40 years a woman marries at age
20, there is a span of 20 years to have children. It would give an
excess of children for all families! It would be impossible to uphold
the rule (for small numbers, which will be analyzed later) under the
hidden argument that at least some children born within the family
would be later available to have sex. Limiting the woman s sexual
ability is then a target for the enforcers, as an indirect form of
limiting the number of opportunities to break the rule. In one extreme
it means forced widowing, war being a way to trim excess men, murder a
way to trim excess women. Note that one of the outcomes of ad hoc,
disfunctional, families, would be
an excess of solitary men, family ties loosening once children grow up
and become (at least partially) independent. This gives a good field
both to recruit enforcers and to generate enough travestism as to, in
case of need, substitute women with men as a way to control natality,
though progeria-like bioterrorism is a more likely and easily applied
technique to control sexual life by turning people old an diseased
before natural old age.

It is important to notice that young or mature, lonely men become a
real danger  or the rule, even when applying the rule will generate a
surplus of them, natural  ffect of disfunctional, loosely tied
families. Enforcers cant keep the count in lonely men, so,
potentially, they can have all sexual couples they want, bypassing the
rule without even engaging in marriage!

Oh! Dont tell me! They were all drugged, having hallucinations, and
since they could not explain them, the hallucinations, they considered
them the AFTERLIFE! I mean, for centuries... maybe after discovering
some substance in some plant, herbalist experiments in an empiric, non
scientific era?

So! I was very much, quite, in control of my life, despite, but a
group of totally uncontrolled people believing they are blessed
decided to impose a group on almost every aspect of my individuality
self expression...

Currently I have no bank account, again. The moment I was just about
to have a positive balance with excedents a few hamburguers ended up
generating a huge debt. By the way, I am still waiting for any news
from voting authorities, nothing in three years.

Be it clear here once and for all with respect to me: I dont believe
in the Afterlife. It doesnt exist. It is irrelevant for one s life. It
goes against biological logic. It is inconsistent; at most, we havent
constructed it, and that is making lots of assumptions...

Dont call me by any other name. I sign using my legal identity.

Human feet are very well adapted to impulse the human body
hidrodynamically in water, while at the same time granting a good
support for running, even in soft terrain. Human feet are unsurpassed
in their ability to impulse in more than one swiming style. It speaks
of a compromise between hunting activities in body water and running
in sand or mud to take cover. The originally flexible but unsupportive
lower hand of primates would acquire the solidity of the heel needed
to acquire speed to escape predators during the relative exposure
between water and jungle/wood cover. Fast runners with less flexible
heels would get the survival advantage that would eventually mold the
right angled human foot. And wouldnt lose collected food by using a
four legged locomotion system. Also while in water the more
hidrodynamical foot with almost bonded toes and fin-like heels would
grant the advantage to escape water predators. Prehominids would be
relatively safe in water and in the woods / jungle, while becoming
prey for slow predators. While in water, a double set of hands is less
useful than a fine versatile fine picking, steer-impulse system
combination. As with the evolution of the hand, a model can be
simulated to investigate the effect of quick impulse in water to
derive the path of evolution between primate hand-feet and human feet.

That particular woman looked like a job colleague s guy, with a boy
who looked like one particular encounter in NYC. If my friends change
face (schizophrenic style) with facial surgeries, I would be unable to
distinguish them, and without ANY MONEY I am unable to approach...
much less to announce disgraces and hardships. So devoid and needed of
intelligence are those thieves that they have to make so many people
go through this? If they are sequestered, KIDNAPPED in the library and
they come in any kind of bad mood or sardonic mood or romantic grudge
BECAUSE I was unable to make my music be heard or any other excuse...
there will be no communications. But I know who was announced as
getting millions from the lottery and then news ed as giving third to
charity... about the time I was totally sent into the street and
stopped short of any form of income... as if I could reproduce in me
their crimianl minds. Circus? Just allowing it is
AntiConstitutional... Too much hidden, too much I want to expose.

Salvia is candidate to produce long term telepathic awareness... turn
you schizo, maybe even telepath. It is the afterglow what gives the
clue, very similar to the light of Saints depicted in paintings
throughout the middle ages. This was suggested by a TV channel web
site.

Fabrizio J Bonsignore now Danilo J Bonsignore