Article View: sci.electronics.design
Article #1773Re: Who Killed the Electric Car?
From: Tim Williams
Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 22:00
Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 22:00
53 lines
4170 bytes
4170 bytes
Do they use permanent magnet, electric field or AC (induction) motors? An electric field DC motor might be the easiest, but the field burns up a couple horsepower sitting there. That would cut into efficiency a bit. [Asynchronous] AC motors are a bit harder to generate power from. The nice thing about a DC motor is you can drive the armature with a big fucking H bridge, open circuit coasts, forward = accelerate, reverse = regenerate / reverse. It's a built in buck-boost. Tim -- Deep Fryer: A very philosophical monk. Website @ http://webpages.charter.net/dawill/tmoranwms "kevin93" <kevin@whitedigs.com> wrote in message news:4c286ed5-dd92-4c84-9c4e-81d507289548@q24g2000prf.googlegroups.com... > On May 18, 9:58 am, JosephKK <quiettechb...@yahoo.com> wrote: > > On Sat, 17 May 2008 18:58:49 -0700 (PDT), kevin93 > <..> > > >This is done to maximize efficiency since the mechanical transmission > > >has an efficiency of 95% or more but the electrical losses through two > > >motor/generators are about 20%. > > > > That is way past remarkably crappy motor and generator efficiencies. > > Both are typically each 95 to 98 percent efficient. Hell the antique > > "Molly Long Legs" topped 99%. > <...> > > I don't know about those you mention but the published peak efficiency > of the ones in the Prius (including the inverter) are about 93%, put > two in series and the losses to convert from mechanical energy back to > mechanical energy when operating at peak efficiency would be about 15% > - for other operating conditions they can be a lot worse, hence my 20% > number. > > AC Propulsion (www.acpropulsion.com) only claim 91% from battery to > shaft for their system with 86% with a "road load" (implying an > average under normal usage). That is even lower than the Toyota > figure. > > When considering regenerative efficiency the numbers get even worse - > the battery may only have a 70% efficiency giving only a 50% overall > energy recovery efficiency. > > Undoubtedly the efficiency could be improved but would add weight and > cost - Toyota and Honda are the only manufacturers with real-world > experience of producing this class of machines in million unit > quantities so presumably these designs represent their view of the > optimum compromise for this application > > kevin
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<3G1Yj.28$lF7.12@newsfe05.lga>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed-0.progon.net!progon.net!news.mediascape.de!newsfeed0.kamp.net!newsfeed.kamp.net!eweka.nl!hq-usenetpeers.eweka.nl!68.142.88.75.MISMATCH!hwmnpeer01.ams!hwmnpeer01.lga!news.highwinds-media.com!hw-filter.lga!newsfe05.lga.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mailReferences:
<482d8412$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <482EE95A.CA9A5635@hotmail.com> <jmdr2493oviid6g9870ashok62182ne1vv@4ax.com> <OdjXj.279$co7.84@nlpi066.nbdc.sbc.com> <482F810D.AC8F5CB2@hotmail.com> <njqXj.1135$BL6.119@nlpi070.nbdc.sbc.com> <pan.2008.05.17.01.18.00.888589@woa.com.au> <fnFXj.506$mh5.166@nlpi067.nbdc.sbc.com> <MPG.2298f55597cb285c9898e7@free.teranews.com> <9283198e-49a6-4153-b1e5-6a0da8ef31b5@s33g2000pri.googlegroups.com> <nqn034h9dl5vqm7d1c2e309vokqlek1q8j@4ax.com> <4c286ed5-dd92-4c84-9c4e-81d507289548@q24g2000prf.googlegroups.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 112d1e,11cc866c366c95ec X-Google-Thread: 103407,11cc866c366c95ec X-Google-Attributes: gid112d1e,gid103407,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!newsfeed-0.progon.net!progon.net!news.mediascape.de!newsfeed0.kamp.net!newsfeed.kamp.net!eweka.nl!hq-usenetpeers.eweka.nl!68.142.88.75.MISMATCH!hwmnpeer01.ams!hwmnpeer01.lga!news.highwinds-media.com!hw-filter.lga!newsfe05.lga.POSTED!53ab2750!not-for-mail From: "Tim Williams" <tmoranwms@charter.net> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,aus.electronics References: <482d8412$1@dnews.tpgi.com.au> <482EE95A.CA9A5635@hotmail.com> <jmdr2493oviid6g9870ashok62182ne1vv@4ax.com> <OdjXj.279$co7.84@nlpi066.nbdc.sbc.com> <482F810D.AC8F5CB2@hotmail.com> <njqXj.1135$BL6.119@nlpi070.nbdc.sbc.com> <pan.2008.05.17.01.18.00.888589@woa.com.au> <fnFXj.506$mh5.166@nlpi067.nbdc.sbc.com> <MPG.2298f55597cb285c9898e7@free.teranews.com> <9283198e-49a6-4153-b1e5-6a0da8ef31b5@s33g2000pri.googlegroups.com> <nqn034h9dl5vqm7d1c2e309vokqlek1q8j@4ax.com> <4c286ed5-dd92-4c84-9c4e-81d507289548@q24g2000prf.googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Who Killed the Electric Car? Lines: 55 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Message-ID: <3G1Yj.28$lF7.12@newsfe05.lga> NNTP-Posting-Host: jkonhpkcapfkohaancjdpecajnjegdeb X-Complaints-To: abuse@charter.net X-Trace: dbkajaeeceiapgbcoldnlfdnfaaakleelmhiemniplandhlmjkonhpkcapfkohaacfbhgfnifmddoeeecpmhlfgoflfgogdgilnfeopnkgdhfihoekaapcakekamlhpbmecikffcoidgldge NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 15:00:31 MST Date: Sun, 18 May 2008 17:00:01 -0500