Article View: sci.electronics.design
Article #2072Re: Low-loss 50 Ohm coaxial cables + connectors for them?
From: Vitaliy
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 21:03
Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 21:03
73 lines
4764 bytes
4764 bytes
dmm wrote: > On 20 Jul 2006 12:21:39 -0700, "Vitaliy" <vmykhayl@ee.ryerson.ca> wrote: > > >Hello, > >Can someone please explain me how the coaxial cables work? > >I'm looking for low loss BNC and SMA cables - 50 Ohm. Low loss is a > >requirement, and as long as the price is not $1/ft for 500ft, any > >reasonable price is ok. Most of my applications are <200MHz. > > How much loss can you tolerate? What are the frequencies your application > will be using? What is your RF budget? What distances will you be transmitting > your signal(s)? What will you be transmitting, RF or data? Do you need to run > the coax around tight corners? Do you need coax that is low smoking and free > of halides? Right now we are using RG58, so it's about 16dB for 100m, slashing that by 8 dB would be good. The frequencies are anywhere between 5MHz and 500MHz. I'm looking at somewhere ~$400 for 500ft. Distances - 1 to 3 meters (maybe 1 or 2 10m ones). I will be transmitting data and RF. I don't see the need for tight corners at this point, but it would be "nice to have" option. No requirement for low smoking/free of halides, but would be "nice-to-have". > All coaxial cables (and connectors) exhibit attenuation (loss) over distance. > Do you consider $1/ft too expensive or too cheap? > > >I see here http://www.gme.net.au/land/antennas/coax_cables.php > >that RG58AU is a low loss BNC > > RG58AU is a type of coaxial cable. BNC is a type of connector. Distributors > that describe a BNC coax cable are talking about a cable that is terminated > with one or more BNC connectors. > > Many BNC connector manufacturers have versions of their connectors > for crimping, soldering, or just screwing them onto the prepared RG58 cable. > Therefore, if, for example, I buy Belden cable, I can just buy BNC, SMB or SMA connectors for that particular cable? > >from the data here http://www.ssbusa.com/comaircom.html > >RG 213 seems to have even lower loss value > > Yes, but it has a larger diameter than RG58 and is more rigid. I recommend > using crimp connectors to terminate RG213 coax because soldering the terminal > pin is a bugger without melting the dielectric slightly. And it takes practice. > I was also thinking about buying crimp connectors, smothing like this http://www.integratednetworkcable.com/productDetailsPopUp.asp?idproduct=1071 or from here http://www.danimex.com/Default.aspx?ID=1363 > >Now, on that last website ECOFLEX has even lower db loss. Ecoflex 10 > >can work with BNC, does it mean I can use it as conventional BNC cable, > >just with low loss? > > Yes if connectors are available, and its probably a good deal more expensive too. > And 10mm diameter as opposed to about 6.5mm to 7mm for RG58 (I think) > But with the extra copper shield the ECOFLEX 10 will be somewhat more rigid > than the RG58. > >I read the BNC connectors are for average speed and SMA connectors are > >for high-speed. Is it true? And can I place BNC, SMA and SMB connectors > >on the cable from the same spool? > > What is "average speed" and "high speed"? The simple answer is to ask the > cable manufacturer/distributor which connector is suitable for the cable for > your application. They should have a list of preferred connector manufacturers > and any suitable connectors. > > >Thanks, > >Vitaliy
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<1153515781.364641.262600@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com!not-for-mailReferences:
<1153423299.149482.91630@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> <fjc1c2d40cbjth1ni5c5trdhgalbb9vu56@4ax.com>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Thread: 112d1e,1bfed7534c4b990c X-Google-Thread: 103407,1bfed7534c4b990c X-Google-Attributes: gid112d1e,gid103407,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!g2news2.google.com!postnews.google.com!p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: "Vitaliy" <vmykhayl@ee.ryerson.ca> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,aus.electronics Subject: Re: Low-loss 50 Ohm coaxial cables + connectors for them? Date: 21 Jul 2006 14:03:01 -0700 Organization: http://groups.google.com Lines: 74 Message-ID: <1153515781.364641.262600@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com> References: <1153423299.149482.91630@h48g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> <fjc1c2d40cbjth1ni5c5trdhgalbb9vu56@4ax.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: 128.100.240.238 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Trace: posting.google.com 1153515786 12313 127.0.0.1 (21 Jul 2006 21:03:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Jul 2006 21:03:06 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <fjc1c2d40cbjth1ni5c5trdhgalbb9vu56@4ax.com> User-Agent: G2/0.2 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1),gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) X-HTTP-Via: 1.1 calamari.uhnres.utoronto.ca:3128 (squid/2.5.STABLE7) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com; posting-host=128.100.240.238; posting-account=y8LvZQ0AAAAaJu-ufjWjKg4Mvxudys0H