Article View: sci.electronics.design
Article #2157Re: Phase detector for huge jitter ??
From: Allan Herriman
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 03:28
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 03:28
44 lines
3105 bytes
3105 bytes
On Wed, 21 Apr 2004 17:48:15 +0200, "5hinka" <anonim99@poczta.wp.pl> wrote: >How to build a phase detector?? >I know that normal design is two flip-fops and NAND gate but it works only >with phase difference between signals smaler than 1 (T). How could I >possibly build a phase detector when phase difference between signals is up >to 10-20 (T)?? It could be hole digital or digital/analog solution. >Anybody know any suitable links?? >Greetings >5hinka The huge jitter only occurs at low frequencies. Firstly, let's fix the terminology. Your 'T' is more commonly referred to as a Unit Interval (UI) when measuring jitter on a 2Mbit/s circuit. According to ITU-T G.823 (and a few others), the maximum tolerable jitter on an E1 is 1.5UIp-p in the band 20Hz - 2400Hz, and 0.2UIp-p in the band 18kHz - 100kHz. Other specs indicate that the jitter / wander may be as high as 18us p-p (36.8UIp-p) in the band from (1/1 day) to 0.8138Hz. (If you draw this on a graph, there's a nice -20dB/decade slope between the segments.) Since you are making test equipment, you should be able to generate and measure jitter with a higher amplitude than this, say by at least 6dB. Your 10-20 UI figure sounds reasonable, but only at mid frequencies. I suggest that a more reasonable specification for test equipment would be: > 80 UIp-p, for frequencies up to 0.81Hz > 3 UIp-p, for frequencies between 20Hz and 18kHz > 0.4 UIp-p, for frequencies greater than 18kHz. I assume you are tracking the incoming phase with a PLL. If the PLL has a loop bandwidth of > 1.5 * 18kHz, the phase detector inside the PLL will never see a phase difference of more than 2 UI p-p, which means that a standard phase detector can be used without going outside its linear range. Regards, Allan.
Technical Details
Message-ID:
<0qde801ok475n4l6s9q8t9k353rifu6cff@4ax.com>Path:
arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.freenet.de!nntp.gblx.net!nntp3.phx1!dnews.tpgi.com.au!tpg.com.au!not-for-mailReferences:
<c66585$b9u$1@nemesis.news.tpi.pl>Show Full Headers
Complete Article Headers
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 112d1e,3cfe9391bca22339 X-Google-Attributes: gid112d1e,public X-Google-Thread: 112e71,3cfe9391bca22339 X-Google-Attributes: gid112e71,public X-Google-Thread: 103407,3cfe9391bca22339 X-Google-Attributes: gid103407,public X-Google-Thread: 107cee,3cfe9391bca22339 X-Google-Attributes: gid107cee,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-04-21 20:29:01 PST From: Allan Herriman <allan.herriman.hates.spam@ctam.com.au.invalid> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design,de.sci.electronics,aus.electronics,sci.electronics.misc Subject: Re: Phase detector for huge jitter ?? Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 13:28:57 +1000 Message-ID: <0qde801ok475n4l6s9q8t9k353rifu6cff@4ax.com> References: <c66585$b9u$1@nemesis.news.tpi.pl> X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.93/32.576 English (American) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.219.10.94 X-Original-NNTP-Posting-Host: 203.219.10.94 X-Trace: dnews.tpgi.com.au!tpg.com.au 1082604537 203.219.10.94 (22 Apr 2004 13:28:57 +1000) Lines: 44 Path: arc1-ca.pugleaf.net!archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.freenet.de!nntp.gblx.net!nntp3.phx1!dnews.tpgi.com.au!tpg.com.au!not-for-mail